Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805789›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

High-Intensity Interval Training for Rowing: Acute Responses in National-Level Adolescent Males.

Emanuela Faelli, Marco Panascì, Vittoria Ferrando, Roberto Codella, Ambra Bisio, Piero Ruggeri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physiological and Mechanical Responses to a Graded Exercise Test in Traditional Rowing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuela FaelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-8021
Marco PanascìDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-2378
Vittoria FerrandoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9647-9276
Roberto CodellaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1608-1899
Ambra BisioDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9385-1714
Piero RuggeriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5939-1489
University of Genoa · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the acute effects of two high-intensity interval training (HIIT) programs on physiological responses and internal workload. Methods: Ten national-level adolescent male rowers (age: 15.7 ± 0.2 years; maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max): 60.11 ± 1.91 mL∙kg−1∙min−1) performed two HIIT testing sessions: short (S-HIIT) and long (L-HIIT). In S-HIIT, the rowers performed 25 reps of 30 s at 100% power at VO2max (Pmax) interspersed with 30 s at P@20% Pmax; whereas in L-HIIT, the rowers executed 4 × 4 min at P@90% Pmax interspersed with 3 min of active recovery (P@30% Pmax). Results: The acute physiological responses and internal workload were evaluated. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. Oxygen uptake (VO2) (p < 0.05), time spent per session at ~90% VO2max (p < 0.01), total VO2 consumed (p < 0.01), total distance (p < 0.001), the rating of perceived exertion, blood lactate concentration and heart rate (always p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in L-HIIT than in S-HIIT. However, peak power output was significantly lower in L-HIIT compared to S-HIIT (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In adolescent rowers, both HIIT tests stimulated aerobic and anaerobic systems. The L-HIIT test was associated with acute cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses, as well as higher perceptions of effort than the S-HIIT test. In adolescent rowers, HIIT emerges as an asset and could be introduced into a traditional in-season, moderate-intensity and endurance-based rowing program once a week.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingWater SportsAdolescentHeart RateHumansMaleOxygenOxygen ConsumptionOxygenadolescentHIITrowingRPEworkload

Identifiers

PMID35805789
PMCPMC9265424
OpenAlexW4283790237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.