Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805757›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Critical Time Period Analysis.

John R Kues, Jacqueline M Knapke, Shereen Elshaer, Angela M Mendell, Laura Hildreth, Stephanie M Schuckman, Julie Wijesooriya, Melinda Butsch Kovacic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John R KuesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Jacqueline M KnapkeDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5585-5629
Shereen ElshaerCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Angela M MendellDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Laura HildrethDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Stephanie M SchuckmanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7060-2336
Julie WijesooriyaCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Melinda Butsch KovacicCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-1446

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a devastating, global public health crisis. Public health systems in the United States heavily focused on getting people to adhere to preventive behaviors, and later, to get vaccinated. January through May of 2021 was a critical and volatile time period for COVID-19 cases, deaths, and expanding vaccination programs coinciding with important political and social events which will have a lasting impact on how the public views science, places trust in our government, and views individual rights. Having collected almost 1400 surveys, our goal was to assess vaccine behavior, explore attitudes toward receiving the vaccine, and identify trusted information sources. More than 83% of our survey respondents said they were at least partially vaccinated. Of 246 unvaccinated, 31.3% were somewhat or extremely likely to get vaccinated when available. Their two most common concerns were vaccine effectiveness (41.1%) and safety (40.2%). Significant differences were observed between respondents who were likely to be vaccinated in the future and those who were hesitant on three of five demographic variables. Our data provide unique insight into the history of behavior and motivations related to COVID-19 vaccines-what will be seen as a "wicked problem" for years to come.

Indexed as

COVID-19Urogenital AbnormalitiesVaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesDemographyHumansPandemicsUnited StatesVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinescommunity-engagedCOVID-19cross-sectional survey designpandemicvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35805757
PMCPMC9265709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.