Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805665›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Managing Minds at Work: Development of a Digital Line Manager Training Program.

Holly Blake, Benjamin Vaughan, Craig Bartle, Jo Yarker, Fehmidah Munir, Steven Marwaha, Guy Daly, Sean Russell, Caroline Meyer, Juliet Hassard and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Holly BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3080-2306
Benjamin VaughanInstitute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Nottingham NG3 6AA, UK.
Craig BartleInstitute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Nottingham NG3 6AA, UK.
Jo YarkerBirkbeck, University of London, London WC1H 0PD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6360-7350
Fehmidah MunirSchool of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-0243
Steven MarwahaInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0303-9942
Guy DalyOffice of the Provost, The British University in Egypt, El Sherouk City 11837, Cairo, Egypt.
Sean RussellThrive at Work, West Midlands Combined Authority, Birmingham B19 3SD, UK.
Caroline MeyerExecutive Office, Warwick University, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Juliet HassardSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3662-052X
Louise ThomsonInstitute of Mental Health, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Nottingham NG3 6AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1736-7506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental ill-health is the leading cause of sickness absence, creating a high economic burden. Workplace interventions aimed at supporting employers in the prevention of mental ill-health in the workforce are urgently required. Managing Minds at Work is a digital intervention aimed at supporting line managers in promoting better mental health at work through a preventative approach. This intervention was developed as part of the Mental Health and Productivity Pilot, a wider initiative aimed at supporting employers across the Midlands region of the United Kingdom to improve the future of workplace mental health and wellbeing. The aim of the study is to describe the design and development of the Managing Minds at Work digital training program, prior to feasibility testing. We adopted a collaborative participatory design involving co-design (users as partners) and principles of user-centred design (pilot and usability testing). An agile methodology was used to co-create intervention content with a stakeholder virtual community of practice. Development processes were mapped to core elements of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. The program covers five broad areas: (i) promoting self-care techniques among line managers; (ii) designing work to prevent work-related stress; (iii) management competencies to prevent and reduce stress; (iv) having conversations with employees about mental health; (v) building a psychologically safe work environment. It was considered by stakeholders to be appropriate for any type of organization, irrespective of their size or resources. Pilot and usability testing (

Indexed as

Mental HealthWorkplaceHumansOrganizationsSelf CareSurveys and Questionnairesdigitalinterventionline managersmental healthoccupationalstresstrainingworkforceworkplace

Identifiers

PMID35805665
PMCPMC9266047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.