Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805606›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load Analysis at Low and High Altitude: A Case Study from Ecuador.

Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Katherine Simbaña-Rivera, Raul Fernandez-Naranjo, Jorge Eduardo Vásconez, Aquiles R Henriquez-Trujillo, Alexander Paolo Vallejo-Janeta, Ismar A Rivera-Olivero, Tannya Lozada, Gines Viscor, Miguel Angel Garcia-Bereguiain and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Health Benefits of Residence at Moderate Altitude Do Not Reduce COVID-19 Mortality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Esteban Ortiz-PradoOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-1895-7498
Katherine Simbaña-RiveraOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-8130-5361
Raul Fernandez-NaranjoOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-4875-9652
Jorge Eduardo VásconezOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-4573-6217
Aquiles R Henriquez-TrujilloOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-4438
Alexander Paolo Vallejo-JanetaLaboratorio de Investigación, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.
Ismar A Rivera-OliveroOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-8345-8217
Tannya LozadaLaboratorio de Investigación, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.
Gines ViscorDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Biology, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-2346
Miguel Angel Garcia-BereguiainOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170124, Ecuador.
UDLA-COVID-19 Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 has spread throughout the world, including remote areas such as those located at high altitudes. There is a debate about the role of hypobaric hypoxia on viral transmission and COVID-19 incidence. A descriptive cross-sectional analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and viral load among patients living at low (230 m) and high altitude (3800 m) in Ecuador was completed. Within these two communities, the total number of infected people at the time of the study was 108 cases (40.3%). The COVID-19 incidence proportion at low altitude was 64% while at high altitude was 30.3%. The mean viral load from those patients who tested positive was 3,499,184 copies/mL (SD = 23,931,479 copies/mL). At low altitude (Limoncocha), the average viral load was 140,223.8 copies/mL (SD = 990,840.9 copies/mL), while for the high altitude group (Oyacachi), the mean viral load was 6,394,789 copies/mL (SD = 32,493,469 copies/mL). We found no statistically significant differences when both results were compared (

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AltitudeCross-Sectional StudiesEcuadorFemaleHumansMaleViral LoadCOVID-19cycle threshold (Ct)high altitudehypoxiaRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2viral load

Identifiers

PMID35805606
PMCPMC9265329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.