Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805551›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Analysis of Perception, Reasons, and Motivations for COVID-19 Vaccination in People with Diabetes across Sub-Saharan Africa: A Mixed-Method Approach.

Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu, Raymond Langsi, Godwin Ovenseri-Ogbomo, Khathutshelo Percy Mashige, Emmanuel Kwasi Abu, Esther Awazzi Envuladu, Piwuna Christopher Goson, Bernadine Nsa Ekpenyong, Richard Oloruntoba, Chundung Asabe Miner and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Uchechukwu Levi OsuagwuTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia.
Raymond LangsiHealth Division, University of Bamenda, Bambili P.O. Box 39, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Godwin Ovenseri-OgbomoDepartment of Optometry, Centre for Health Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness IV2 3JH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6638-3222
Khathutshelo Percy MashigeAfrican Vision Research Institute (AVRI), Discipline of Optometry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban 3629, South Africa.
Emmanuel Kwasi AbuDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast 03321, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-2354-9170
Esther Awazzi EnvuladuDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos 930001, Nigeria.
Piwuna Christopher GosonDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos 930001, Nigeria.
Bernadine Nsa EkpenyongDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar 540271, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3531-5577
Richard OloruntobaSchool of Management and Marketing, Curtin Business School Bentley, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4305-7352
Chundung Asabe MinerDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos 930001, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-1623-7347
Deborah Donald CharweTanzania Food and Nutrition Center, Dar-es-Salaam P.O. Box 977, Tanzania.
Chikasirimobi Goodhope TimothyDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu 105200, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0001-5832-484X
Tanko IshayaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Jos, Jos 930001, Nigeria.
Onyekachukwu Mary-Anne AmiebenomoDepartment of Optometry, University of Benin, Benin 300213, Nigeria.
David LimTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2837-0973
Kingsley E AghoTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4111-3207
University of Jos · NGTranslational Research Institute · AUAfrica Health Research Institute · ZACurtin University · AUMzuzu University · MWTanzania Food and Nutrition Center · TZUniversity of Bamenda · CMUniversity of Benin · NGUniversity of Calabar · NGUniversity of Cape Coast · GHUniversity of the Highlands and Islands · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with severe COVID-19 infection and complications. This study assesses COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in people with DM, and explores the reasons for not being vaccinated. This was a web-based cross-sectional survey using a mixed-method approach conducted in March-May 2021, corresponding to most Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries' early vaccine rollout period. Participants were those aged ≥18 years with self-reported DM in 11 Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. Responses to comments on the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and facilitators for vaccine uptake were analyzed. Of the 73 participants with DM, 65.8% were males, older than 35 years (86.3%), had postsecondary education (90%), and a significant proportion were from South Africa (39.7%), Nigeria (28.8%) and Ghana (13.7%). At the time of this study, 64.4% experienced COVID-19 symptoms, 46.6% were tested for COVID-19, of which 19.2% tested positive. Few participants (6.8%) had received a COVID-19 vaccination, 65.8% were willing to take the vaccine when it becomes available in their country, while 26.0% either refused or remained hesitant towards taking the vaccine. The main identified reasons for not taking the vaccine were: advice from religious leaders; concerns about the safety, effects, and efficacy of the vaccines; mistrust of the pharmaceutical companies producing the vaccines and the process of production; the conspiracy theories around the vaccines; and the personal belief of the participants regarding vaccination. However, participants stated they would take the vaccine if they were more educated about it, received positive feedback from those vaccinated, were rewarded for taking the vaccine, or if vaccination became a condition for travel and employment. In conclusion, this study shows that the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine was very low in this high-risk group. Efforts to increase the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among people with diabetes are imperative, such as the provision of education and relevant information.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes MellitusVaccinesAdolescentAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMotivationNigeriaPerceptionVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinescoronavirusdiabeteshesitancylockdownqualitativerefusalSub-Saharan Africasurveyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID35805551
PMCPMC9266073
OpenAlexW4283658636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.