Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805491›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Probiotic Monotherapy with

Claudia Salinas-Azuceno, Miryam Martínez-Hernández, José-Isaac Maldonado-Noriega, Adriana-Patricia Rodríguez-Hernández, Laurie-Ann Ximenez-Fyvie

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Impact ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  6. The impact of prebiotics and probiotics on the oral microbiome of individuals with periodontal disease: a scoping review.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia Salinas-AzucenoLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México 04360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9357-477X
Miryam Martínez-HernándezLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México 04360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1589-8605
José-Isaac Maldonado-NoriegaCentro de Estudios Superiores de Ortodoncia (CESO), Nicolás San Juan 1628, Ciudad de México 03100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8667-7818
Adriana-Patricia Rodríguez-HernándezLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México 04360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9473-1749
Laurie-Ann Ximenez-FyvieLaboratorio de Genética Molecular, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México 04360, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4370-0843
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXCentro de Estudios Superiores Universitarios · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Probiotics can be considered a non-invasive periodontal monotherapy for the modulation of microbiota when periodontal treatment is not accessible. The aim was to evaluate the ability of Lactobacillus reuteri Prodentis as monotherapy to modulate periodontal parameters and subgingival biofilm dysbiosis. (2) Methods: A 30-year-old patient with periodontitis was followed longitudinally after one month of daily consumption of L. reuteri Prodentis (T0). Periodontal measurements and microbial identification by Checkerboard DNA−DNA hybridization of 40 bacteria were compared between baseline (T0) and 30 days (T1) or 90 days (T2), using the Kruskal−Wallis (KW) and Mann−Whitney U (MW) tests. (3) Results: Low values of pocket depth, attachment level, dental plaque, gingival erythema (GE), and suppuration were observed at T0 vs. T1, with the clinical improvement of GE (p < 0.05, MW) and the recovery of tooth 46 fistulation. T1 vs. T0 comparisons showed lower levels (Lev) or proportions (Prop) of Parvimonas micra (Lev: p < 0.05, MW; Prop: p < 0.01, MW) and Streptococcus gordonii (Prop: p < 0.05, MW), and a predominance (Lev/Prop) of Actinomyces odontolyticus and Streptococcus mitis; lower levels and proportions of P. micra, Eubacterium saburreum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Tannerella forsythia were observed in tooth 46 (T1/T2 vs. T0). (4) Conclusions: Under monotherapy with L. reuteri Prodentis, periodontal measurements of the patient were maintained, with selective changes in the subgingival microbiota that were proportional to the time of probiotic administration, with any additional periodontal treatment.

Indexed as

Limosilactobacillus reuteriPeriodontitisProbioticsAdultDNADysbiosisHumansPorphyromonas gingivalisDNADNA–DNA hybridizationLactobacillus reuteri Prodentisoral probioticsperiodontitissubgingival dysbiosis

Identifiers

PMID35805491
PMCPMC9265494
OpenAlexW4283515160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.