Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805468›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Deploying and Maintaining Standards of New Pharmacy Services Provision in Poland-Introducing the National Pharmacist Competencies Assessment Tool: Pre-Registration Exam-Results of the Pilot Project.

Piotr Merks, Urszula Religioni, Aleksandra Howell, Marvin Munzu, Edwin Panford-Quainoo, Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska, Radosław Jaskólski, Beata Kaczmarek, Justyna Kaźmierczak, Eliza Blicharska and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Piotr MerksFaculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, 01-815 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8966-3799
Urszula ReligioniCollegium of Business Administration, Warsaw School of Economics, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1434-2138
Aleksandra HowellDepartment of Pharmacy, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Marvin MunzuDay-Lewis Pharmacy, Huntingdon PE29 3RL, UK.
Edwin Panford-QuainooLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-3268
Agnieszka Neumann-PodczaskaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0060-7430
Radosław JaskólskiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-089 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Beata KaczmarekDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.
Justyna KaźmierczakZdrowit sp. z o.o., Pharmacy Chain, ul. Diamentowa 3, 41-940 Piekary Śląskie, Poland.
Eliza BlicharskaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 4a, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Paweł OlczykDepartment of Community Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 40-027 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7387-9587
Agnieszka BarańskaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Statistics with e-Health Lab, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4864-0184
Magdalena Waszyk-NowaczykDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6607-5126
Jerzy KrysińskiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-089 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6240-4444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the functioning of the Bologna Declaration, the knowledge and skills of graduates educated in different countries may differ significantly. Therefore, this article aims to present the differences in results of the final exam in pharmacy among Polish pharmacy students. This exam was modeled on the British national exam supervised by the General Pharmaceutical Council. The exam was conducted in three cities in Poland, among a total of 175 final-year students (a full sample of those eligible was 451 with 276 refusals (38.58% response rate)). Taking the exam was voluntary and anonymous. The results indicate that none of the Polish students achieved the 70% mark required to pass the Great Britain exam. Significant differences in test results were noticed between cities. Students achieved the best average exam result in Bydgoszcz (46.35%), then in Warsaw (38.81%) and Łódź (38.35%). The pharmaceutical education system in Poland requires complete changes that will prepare future pharmacists for clinical work.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical ServicesStudents, PharmacyHumansPharmacistsPilot ProjectsPolandeducationeducational standardspharmaceutical educationpharmacistPoland

Identifiers

PMID35805468
PMCPMC9266189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.