Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805367›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Viral Eco-Genomic Tools: Development and Implementation for Aquatic Biomonitoring.

Gomaa Mostafa-Hedeab, Abdou Kamal Allayeh, Hany Abdelfattah Elhady, Abozer Y Eledrdery, Mobarak Abu Mraheil, Ahmed Mostafa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gomaa Mostafa-HedeabPharmacology Department and Health Research Unit, Medical College, Jouf University, Skaka 11564, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-0495
Abdou Kamal AllayehWater Pollution Department, Virology Laboratory, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-1550-4140
Hany Abdelfattah ElhadySurgery Department, Medical College, Jouf University, Sakaka 11564, Saudi Arabia.
Abozer Y EledrderyDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka 11564, Saudi Arabia.
Mobarak Abu MraheilGerman Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Institute of Medical Microbiology, Justus-Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Ahmed MostafaCenter of Scientific Excellence for Influenza Viruses, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-5714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteric viruses (EVs) occurrence within aquatic environments varies and leads to significant risk on public health of humans, animals, and diversity of aquatic taxa. Early and efficacious recognition of cultivable and fastidious EVs in aquatic systems are important to ensure the sanitary level of aquatic water and implement required treatment strategies. Herein, we provided a comprehensive overview of the conventional and up-to-date eco-genomic tools for aquatic biomonitoring of EVs, aiming to develop better water pollution monitoring tools. In combination with bioinformatics techniques, genetic tools including cloning sequencing analysis, DNA microarray, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and metagenomic sequencing technologies are implemented to make informed decisions about the global burden of waterborne EVs-associated diseases. The data presented in this review are helpful to recommend that: (1) Each viral pollution detection method has its own merits and demerits; therefore, it would be advantageous for viral pollution evaluation to be integrated as a complementary platform. (2) The total viral genome pool extracted from aquatic environmental samples is a real reflection of pollution status of the aquatic eco-systems; therefore, it is recommended to conduct regular sampling through the year to establish an updated monitoring system for EVs, and quantify viral peak concentrations, viral typing, and genotyping. (3) Despite that conventional detection methods are cheaper, it is highly recommended to implement molecular-based technologies to complement aquatic ecosystems biomonitoring due to numerous advantages including high-throughput capability. (4) Continuous implementation of the eco-genetic detection tools for monitoring the EVs in aquatic ecosystems is recommended.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnterovirusAnimalsBiological MonitoringEnvironmental MonitoringGenome, ViralMetagenomicsWater Microbiologyaquatic biomonitoringeco-genomic toolsenteric virusespollutants

Identifiers

PMID35805367
PMCPMC9265447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.