Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805350›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Feeding Practices, Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Vaginal Birth after Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.

Patryk Rudzinski, Inga Lopuszynska, Katarzyna Pieniak, Daria Stelmach, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patryk RudzinskiStudents' Scientific Group Affiliated to II Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-2187
Inga LopuszynskaStudents' Scientific Group Affiliated to II Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.
Katarzyna PieniakStudents' Scientific Group Affiliated to II Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-5758
Daria StelmachStudents' Scientific Group Affiliated to II Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.
Joanna Kacperczyk-BartnikII Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.
Ewa Romejko-WolniewiczII Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cesarean section rates are constantly rising, and the number of women with a prior cesarean considering a delivery mode for their next labor is increasing. We aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes and feeding method in women undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) versus elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD). This was a retrospective cohort study of women with one prior cesarean delivery (CD) and no previous vaginal births, delivering vaginally or by a CD in a single institution between 2016 and 2018. 355 live singleton spontaneous vaginal and cesarean deliveries were included. 121 women delivered vaginally and 234 had a CD. Neonates born by a CD were more likely to have higher birth weight (p < 0.001), higher weight at discharge (p < 0.001), macrosomia (p = 0.030), lose >10% of their body mass (p = 0.001), be mixed-fed (p < 0.001), and be hospitalized longer (p < 0.001). Children born vaginally were more likely to be exclusively breastfed (p < 0.001). Women undergoing VBAC were more likely to deliver preterm (p = 0.006) and post-term (p < 0.001), present with PROM (p < 0.001), have greater PROM latency period (p < 0.001), and experience intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (p = 0.029), postpartum anemia (p < 0.001), and peripartum blood loss >1 L (p = 0.049). The incidence of anemia during pregnancy was higher in the ERCD cohort (p = 0.047). Women undergoing VBAC are more likely to breastfeed their children, perhaps for the same reason they choose the vaginal method of delivery, as vaginal delivery and breastfeeding along with antibiotic use, are the most important factors decreasing the risk for future diseases in their offspring.

Indexed as

Vaginal Birth after CesareanCesarean SectionCesarean Section, RepeatChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTrial of Laborcesarean sectionfeeding methodpregnancypregnancy outcomerepeat cesarean sectionvaginal birth after cesarean

Identifiers

PMID35805350
PMCPMC9265261
OpenAlexW4283379243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.