Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805325›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Discussions of Flavored ENDS Sales Restrictions: Themes Related to Circumventing Policies on Reddit.

Nathan Silver, Padmini Kucherlapaty, Ganna Kostygina, Hy Tran, Miao Feng, Sherry Emery, Barbara Schillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan SilverTruth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC 20001, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0325-2559
Padmini KucherlapatyTruth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC 20001, USA.
Ganna KostyginaNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60603, USA.
Hy TranNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60603, USA.
Miao FengNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60603, USA.
Sherry EmeryNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60603, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-9990
Barbara SchilloTruth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, DC 20001, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine conversations among JUUL users on Reddit related to restrictions on flavored ENDS and the shifting policy landscape.

methodsPosts and comments (

resultsOverall activity on the subreddit r/JUUL peaked around the time of the EVALI outbreak (September 2019) and when FDA issued guidance restricting flavored ENDS product sales (January 2020). The N-gram analysis revealed an active discussion of banned products one can "still get" or "JUUL compatible" alternatives, including specific brands, brick and mortar locations, and specific flavors. Ten dominant themes emerged from the qualitative review, with some posts containing more than one theme.

conclusionMany users turned to Reddit for information related to the shifting regulatory landscape concerning flavored ENDS. Discussions focused on both legal alternatives to banned products as well as illegal means of acquiring JUUL pods, including residual retail supply, online, and mail vendors.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsText MessagingTobacco ProductsCommerceFlavoring AgentsMarketingPolicyFlavoring Agentsadvertising and promotionmediatobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID35805325
PMCPMC9266029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.