Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805313›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Ischemic Preconditioning with High and Low Pressure Enhances Maximum Strength and Modulates Heart Rate Variability.

Luiz Guilherme Telles, François Billaut, Aline de Souza Ribeiro, Christian Geórgea Junqueira, Luís Leitão, Ana Cristina Barreto, Patricia Panza, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Jefferson da Silva Novaes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Luiz Guilherme TellesPhysical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil.
François BillautDepartment of Kinesiology, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4373-4245
Aline de Souza RibeiroPhysical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro 36036-900, Brazil.
Christian Geórgea JunqueiraVolta Redonda University Center, Rio de Janeiro 27240-560, Brazil.
Luís LeitãoSciences and Technology Department, Superior School of Education of Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1981-6638
Ana Cristina BarretoCelso Lisboa University Center, Rio de Janeiro 20950-092, Brazil.
Patricia PanzaPhysical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro 36036-900, Brazil.
Jeferson Macedo ViannaPhysical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, São Pedro 36036-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1594-4429
Jefferson da Silva NovaesPhysical Education and Sports Department, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRCentro Universitário Celso Lisboa · BRCentro Universitário de Volta Redonda · BRLife Quality Research Centre · PTUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The application of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) to resistance exercise has attracted some attention, owing to increases in muscle performance. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal occlusion pressure for this procedure. This study compared the acute effects of IPC with high and low pressure of occlusion on upper and lower limb maximal strength and heart rate variability in recreationally trained individuals. Methods: Sixteen recreationally trained men (25.3 ± 1.7 years; 78.4 ± 6.2 kg; 176.9 ± 5.4 cm; 25.1 ± 1.5 m2 kg−1) were thoroughly familiarized with one repetition maximum (1 RM) testing in the following exercises: bench press (BP), front latissimus pull-down (FLPD), and shoulder press (SP) for upper limbs, and leg press 45º (LP45), hack machine (HM), and Smith Squat (SS) for lower limbs. The 1 RM exercises were then randomly performed on three separate days: after a high pressure (220 mmHg, IPChigh) and a low pressure (20 mmHg, IPClow) IPC protocol and after no intervention (control, CON). Heart rate variability was also measured at rest, during and after the entire IPC protocol, and after the exercises. Results: Maximal strength was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in both IPChigh and IPClow compared with CON in all upper- and lower-limb exercises. There was no difference between the two experimental conditions. No significant differences were found in the comparison across the different experimental conditions for LFnu, HFnu, LF/HF ratio, and RMSSDms. Conclusions: IPC performed with both high and low pressures influenced heart rate variability, which may partly explain the maximal strength enhancement.

Indexed as

Ischemic PreconditioningResistance TrainingHeart RateHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthWeight Liftingheart rate variabilityischemic preconditioningmaximum strengthresistance exercises

Identifiers

PMID35805313
PMCPMC9265721
OpenAlexW4283330112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.