Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805309›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

"Let's Use This Mess to Our Advantage": Calls to Action to Optimize School Nutrition Program beyond the Pandemic.

Beth N Katz, Jessica Soldavini, Kiran Grover, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie L Martin, Linden Thayer, Alice S Ammerman, Hannah G Lane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Beth N KatzFood Insight Group, Berkeley, CA 94707, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5913-8061
Jessica SoldaviniCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kiran GroverIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Stephanie Jilcott PittsDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Stephanie L MartinDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Linden ThayerFood Insight Group, Berkeley, CA 94707, USA.
Alice S AmmermanDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Hannah G LaneDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8370-6647
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USEast Carolina University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute K12HL138030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School nutrition programs mitigate food insecurity and promote healthy eating by offering consistent, nutritious meals to school-aged children in communities across the United States; however, stringent policy guidelines and contextual challenges often limit participation. During COVID-19 school closures, most school nutrition programs remained operational, adapting quickly and innovating to maximize reach. This study describes semi-structured interviews with 23 nutrition directors in North Carolina, which aimed to identify multi-level contextual factors that influenced implementation, as well as ways in which the innovations during COVID-19 could translate to permanent policy and practice change and improve program reach. Interviews were conducted during initial school closures (May-August 2020) and were deductively analyzed using the Social Ecological Model (SEM) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Analysis elicited multiple relevant contextual factors: director characteristics (motivation, leadership style, experience), key implementation stakeholders (internal staff and external partners), inner setting (implementation climate, local leadership engagement, available resources, structural characteristics), and outer setting (state leadership engagement, external policies and incentives). Findings confirm the strength and resilience of program directors and staff, the importance of developing strategies to strengthen external partnerships and emergency preparedness, and strong support from directors for policies offering free meals to all children.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsChildDiet, HealthyFood InsecurityHumansSchoolsUnited Stateschild or adolescentCOVID-19food insecuritypolicy implementation scienceschool meal programsschool wellness

Identifiers

PMID35805309
PMCPMC9265650
OpenAlexW4283327053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.