Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805278›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Peer Support and Mental Health of Migrant Domestic Workers: A Scoping Review.

Ken Hok Man Ho, Chen Yang, Alex Kwun Yat Leung, Daniel Bressington, Wai Tong Chien, Qijin Cheng, Daphne Sze Ki Cheung

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Self-compassion in context: a reflexive thematic analysis of migrant domestic workers' experiences in Singapore.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ken Hok Man HoThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong SAR, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4934-2450
Chen YangThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong SAR, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1415-8752
Alex Kwun Yat LeungDepartment of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China.
Daniel BressingtonCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Darwin 0815, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0951-2208
Wai Tong ChienThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong SAR, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5321-5791
Qijin ChengDepartment of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6223-5345
Daphne Sze Ki CheungSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5651-9352
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKCharles Darwin University · AUHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust TT2116203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of peer support in improving mental health and well-being has been well documented for vulnerable populations. However, how peer support is delivered to migrant domestic workers (MDWs) to support their mental health is still unknown. This scoping review aimed to synthesize evidence on existing peer support services for improving mental health among MDWs. We systematically searched eight electronic databases, as well as grey literature. Two reviewers independently performed title/abstract and full-text screening, and data extraction. Twelve articles were finally included. Two types of peer support were identified from the included studies, i.e., mutual aid and para-professional trained peer support. MDWs mainly seek support from peers through mutual aid for emotional comfort. The study's findings suggest that the para-professional peer support training program was highly feasible and culturally appropriate for MDWs. However, several barriers were identified to affect the successful implementation of peer support, such as concerns about emotion contagion among peers, worries about disclosure of personal information, and lack of support from health professionals. Culture-specific peer support programs should be developed in the future to overcome these barriers to promote more effective mental health practices.

Indexed as

Mental HealthTransients and MigrantsCounselingHealth PersonnelHumansPeer Groupmental healthmigrant domestic workerpeer supportscoping review

Identifiers

PMID35805278
PMCPMC9265321
OpenAlexW4283314059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.