Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35805218›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Are Measures of Health Status for the Total Population Good Proxies for the Health of the Older Population in International Comparison Studies?

Ewa Kocot, Sabina Denkowska, Kamil Fijorek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ewa KocotHealth Economics and Social Security Department, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-066 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1160-9826
Sabina DenkowskaDepartment of Statistics, Institute of Quantitative Methods in Social Sciences, College of Economics, Finance and Law, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-8010
Kamil FijorekDepartment of Statistics, Institute of Quantitative Methods in Social Sciences, College of Economics, Finance and Law, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1262-6425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of population aging, the health of older people is becoming especially important, impacting various areas of life, societies and countries' economies. To provide the basis for effective decisions to achieve better health, comparative analyses can be used to find best practices to follow. The aim of the research was to check whether drawing conclusions about the older population's health based on the health status of the total population is justified in international comparison analyses. An analysis was conducted for six population health indicators for European countries from 2010-2019. Rankings were created for the total population and the older subpopulation, and then ranks for these two populations were compared using statistical methods. The statistical analyses indicate that there is a strong, statistically significant relationship between the ranks for the total and the older population. However, looking at the descriptive analysis and visual presentation of data, differences in international rankings of indicator values for these two populations can be observed. As older people comprise a specific group of the population that is growing ever bigger and increasingly significant, it would be advisable to present the results of international comparisons not only for the total, but separately for the older population as well.

Indexed as

AgingHealth StatusAgedEuropeHumanscomparative analyseshealth indicatorsolder populationpopulation health

Identifiers

PMID35805218
PMCPMC9265627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.