Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804975›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Non-Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer: Lessons Learnt from the OPRA Trial.

Paolo Goffredo, Felipe F Quezada-Diaz, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, J Joshua Smith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06940388 (Total Neoadjuvant Treatment With or Without Tislelizumab for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06940388 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Total Neoadjuvant Treatment With or Without Tislelizumab for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Open-label Randomized Controlled Phase II Study (The TOTAL Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorbrenner baruchRan2025 to 2030Enrolled134ConditionsLocally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC)ArmsTislelizumab, Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shared decision-making in radiotherapy for rectal cancer - A systematic review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Colorectal cancer: Recent advances in management and treatment.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Colon cancer survival in the elderly without curative surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo GoffredoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Felipe F Quezada-DiazColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Doctor Sótero del Río, Santiago 8150215, Chile.
Julio Garcia-AguilarDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
J Joshua SmithDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USComplejo Asistencial Sótero del Río · CL

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has progressively become more complex. The introduction of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has increased the rates of both clinical and pathological complete response, resulting in excellent long-term oncological outcomes. As a result, non-operative management (NOM) of LARC patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy has gained acceptance as a potential treatment option in selected cases. NOM is based on replacement of surgical resection with safe and active surveillance. However, the identification of appropriate candidates for a NOM strategy without compromising oncologic safety is currently challenging due to the lack of an objective standardization. NOM should be part of the treatment plan discussion with LARC patients, considering the increasing rates of cCR, patient preference, quality of life, expectations, and the potential avoidance of surgical morbidity. The recently published OPRA trial showed that organ preservation is achievable in half of rectal cancer patients treated with TNT, and that chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy may an appropriate strategy to maximize cCR rates. Ongoing trials are investigating optimal algorithms of TNT delivery to further expand the pool of patients who may benefit from NOM of LARC.

Indexed as

chemoradiationneoadjuvant therapynonoperative managementrectal cancertotal neoadjuvant therapywatch and wait

Identifiers

PMID35804975
PMCPMC9264788
OpenAlexW4283764580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.