Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804963›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

18FDG PET Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma Treated with First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Alexia Rivas, Julie Delyon, Antoine Martineau, Estelle Blanc, Clara Allayous, Laetitia Da Meda, Pascal Merlet, Céleste Lebbé, Barouyr Baroudjian, Laetitia Vercellino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic value of TMTV and Dmax calculated fromEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The prognostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexia RivasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Julie DelyonDepartment of Dermatology, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4557-3377
Antoine MartineauDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Estelle BlancDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Clara AllayousDepartment of Dermatology, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Laetitia Da MedaDepartment of Dermatology, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Pascal MerletDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Céleste LebbéDepartment of Dermatology, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Barouyr BaroudjianDepartment of Dermatology, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Laetitia VercellinoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AP-HP Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010 Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are currently the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma. We investigated the value of positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria to assess the therapeutic response to first-line ICI in this clinical context and explore the potential contribution of total tumor metabolic volume (TMTV) analysis.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study in patients treated with first-line ICI for advanced or metastatic melanoma, with 18F-FDG PET/CT performed at baseline and 3 months after starting treatment. Patients' metabolic response was classified according to PERCIST5 and imPERCIST 5 criteria. TMTV was recorded for each examination.

resultsTwenty-nine patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 51.2 months (IQR 13.6-not reached), and the OS rate at 2 years was 58.6%. Patients classified as responders (complete and partial response) had a 90.9% 2-year OS rate versus 38.9% for non-responders (stable disease and progressive disease) (

conclusionThe evaluation of response to immunotherapy using metabolic imaging with PERCIST5 and imPERCIST5 was significantly associated with OS in patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma.

Indexed as

FDG PETimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapymelanomatherapeutic response

Identifiers

PMID35804963
PMCPMC9264956
OpenAlexW4283731537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.