Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804951›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Prospective Comparison of the Performance of MRI Versus CT in the Detection and Evaluation of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies.

Claramae Shulyn Chia, Louis Choon Kit Wong, Tiffany Priyanthi Hennedige, Whee Sze Ong, Hong-Yuan Zhu, Grace Hwei Ching Tan, Jin Wei Kwek, Chin Jin Seo, Jolene Si Min Wong, Chin-Ann Johnny Ong and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MRI for restaging pancreatic cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Imaging of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A CT-Based Lung Radiomics Nomogram for Classifying the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claramae Shulyn ChiaDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Louis Choon Kit WongDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5380-6778
Tiffany Priyanthi HennedigeDivision of Oncological Imaging, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7247-6153
Whee Sze OngDivision of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3531-6182
Hong-Yuan ZhuDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Grace Hwei Ching TanDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Jin Wei KwekDivision of Oncological Imaging, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Chin Jin SeoDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Jolene Si Min WongDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Chin-Ann Johnny OngDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4573-7738
Choon Hua ThngDivision of Oncological Imaging, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Khee Chee SooDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Melissa Ching Ching TeoDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Singapore General Hospital · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

National Cancer Centre Singapore National Cancer Center Singapore (NCCS) Cancer Fund (Research)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The performance of MRI versus CT in the detection and evaluation of peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) remains unclear in the current literature. Our study is the first prospective study in an Asian center comparing the two imaging modalities, validated against intra-operative findings. Methods: A total of 36 patients with PSM eligible for CRS-HIPEC underwent both MRI and CT scans up to 6 weeks before the operation. The scans were assessed for the presence and distribution of PSM and scored using the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), which were compared against PCI determined at surgery. Results: Both MRI and CT were 100% sensitive and specific in detecting the overall presence of PSM. Across all peritoneal regions, the sensitivity and specificity for PSM detection was 49.1% and 93.0% for MRI, compared to 47.8% and 95.1% for CT (p = 0.76). MRI was more sensitive than CT for small bowel disease, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Comparing PCI on imaging with intra-operative PCI, the mean difference was found to be −3.4 ± 5.4 (p < 0.01) for MRI, and −3.9 ± 4.1 (p < 0.01) for CT. The correlation between imaging and intra-operative PCI was poor, with a concordance coefficient of 0.76 and 0.79 for MRI and CT, respectively. Within individual peritoneal regions, there was also poor agreement between imaging and intra-operative PCI for both modalities, other than in regions 1 and 3. Conclusion: MRI and CT are comparable in the detection and evaluation of PSM. While sensitive in the overall detection of PSM, they are likely to underestimate the true disease burden.

Indexed as

computed tomographycytoreductive surgeryintraperitoneal chemotherapymagnetic resonance imagingperitoneal cancer indexperitoneal metastases

Identifiers

PMID35804951
PMCPMC9264985
OpenAlexW4283714368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.