Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804933›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Systems for Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Antonio Melillo, Andrea Chirico, Giuseppe De Pietro, Luigi Gallo, Giuseppe Caggianese, Daniela Barone, Michelino De Laurentiis, Antonio Giordano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The influence of virtual reality on anxiety and pain in breast cancer patients: A systematic review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cardio-oncology rehabilitation: are we ready?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio MelilloDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, "Luigi Vanvitelli" University of Campania, 80129 Naples, Italy.
Andrea ChiricoDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9955-1926
Giuseppe De PietroInstitute for High Performance Computing and Networking, National Research Council of Italy (ICAR-CNR), 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4675-5957
Luigi GalloInstitute for High Performance Computing and Networking, National Research Council of Italy (ICAR-CNR), 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-404X
Giuseppe CaggianeseInstitute for High Performance Computing and Networking, National Research Council of Italy (ICAR-CNR), 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6607-6591
Daniela BaroneCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5543-7686
Michelino De LaurentiisDepartment of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, ItaliaORCID 0000-0001-9009-1572
Antonio GiordanoDepartment of Biology, Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5959-016X
Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITTemple University · USUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in cancer care, as the functioning of cancer survivors is frequently compromised by impairments that can result from the disease itself but also from the long-term sequelae of the treatment. Nevertheless, the current literature shows that only a minority of patients receive physical and/or cognitive rehabilitation. This lack of rehabilitative care is a consequence of many factors, one of which includes the transportation issues linked to disability that limit the patient's access to rehabilitation facilities. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has further shown the benefits of improving telemedicine and home-based rehabilitative interventions to facilitate the delivery of rehabilitation programs when attendance at healthcare facilities is an obstacle. In recent years, researchers have been investigating the benefits of the application of virtual reality to rehabilitation. Virtual reality is shown to improve adherence and training intensity through gamification, allow the replication of real-life scenarios, and stimulate patients in a multimodal manner. In our present work, we offer an overview of the present literature on virtual reality-implemented cancer rehabilitation. The existence of wide margins for technological development allows us to expect further improvements, but more randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the hypothesis that VRR may improve adherence rates and facilitate telerehabilitation.

Indexed as

cancerdisabilityfatiguelymphedemapainrealityrehabilitationroboticstelemedicinevirtual

Identifiers

PMID35804933
PMCPMC9264833
OpenAlexW4283713426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.