ArticleCancers2022
Quantitative Analysis of the
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- ATRX, OLIG2, MGMT, and IDH2 in Glioblastoma: Essential Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Significance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Predictive modeling with linear machine learning can estimate glioblastoma survival in months based solely on MGMT-methylation status, age and sex.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- MGMT Promoter Methylation: Prognostication beyond Treatment Response.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- 4-Methylumbelliferone enhances the effects of chemotherapy on both temozolomide-sensitive and resistant glioblastoma cells.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Glioblastomas with methylation of the promoter region of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene exhibit increased sensitivity to alkylating chemotherapy. Quantitative assessment of the MGMT promoter methylation status might provide additional prognostic information. The aim of our study was to determine a quantitative methylation threshold for better survival among patients with glioblastomas. Methods: We included consecutive patients ≥18 years treated at our department between 11/2010 and 08/2018 for a glioblastoma, IDH wildtype, undergoing quantitative MGMT promoter methylation analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: A total of 321 patients were included. Median overall survival was 12.6 months. Kaplan−Meier and adjusted Cox regression analysis showed better survival for the groups with 16−30%, 31−60%, and 61−100% methylation. In contrast, survival in the group with 1−15% methylation was similar to those with unmethylated promoter regions. A secondary analysis confirmed this threshold. Conclusions: Better survival is observed in patients with glioblastomas with ≥16% methylation of the MGMT promoter region than with <16% methylation. Survival with tumors with 1−15% methylation is similar to with unmethylated tumors. Above 16% methylation, we found no additional benefit with increasing methylation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.