ReviewCancers2022
Pre-PCR Mutation-Enrichment Methods for Liquid Biopsy Applications.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid Biopsies in HNSCC: Current Landscape and Emerging Opportunities in the Era of HPV Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a multi-marker liquid bead array assay for the simultaneous detection ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- A panorama of colon cancer in the era of liquid biopsy.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2024Review
- Extrinsic and intrinsic preanalytical variables affecting liquid biopsy in cancer.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Review
- Enzymatic Methods for Mutation Detection in Cancer Samples and Liquid Biopsies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinical Utility and Application of Liquid Biopsy Genotyping in Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid biopsy is having a remarkable impact on healthcare- and disease-management in the context of personalized medicine. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) is one of the most instructive liquid-biopsy-based biomarkers and harbors valuable information for diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic purposes. When it comes to cancer, circulating DNA from the tumor (ctDNA) has a wide range of applications, from early cancer detection to the early detection of relapse or drug resistance, and the tracking of the dynamic genomic make-up of tumor cells. However, the detection of ctDNA remains technically challenging, due, in part, to the low frequency of ctDNA among excessive circulating cfDNA originating from normal tissues. During the past three decades, mutation-enrichment methods have emerged to boost sensitivity and enable facile detection of low-level mutations. Although most developed techniques apply mutation enrichment during or following initial PCR, there are a few techniques that allow mutation selection prior to PCR, which provides advantages. Pre-PCR enrichment techniques can be directly applied to genomic DNA and diminish the influence of PCR errors that can take place during amplification. Moreover, they have the capability for high multiplexity and can be followed by established mutation detection and enrichment technologies without changes to their established procedures. The first approaches for pre-PCR enrichment were developed by employing restriction endonucleases directly on genomic DNA in the early 1990s. However, newly developed pre-PCR enrichment methods provide higher sensitivity and versatility. This review describes the available pre-PCR enrichment methods and focuses on the most recently developed techniques (NaME-PrO, UVME, and DEASH/MAESTRO), emphasizing their applications in liquid biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.