ArticleCancers2022
Comprehensive Comparison of 22C3 and SP263 PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Routine Clinical and Conditioned Archives.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Interchangeability of PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assays in First-Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Management With Cemiplimab.JCO precision oncology · 2025Trial
- Clinical relevance of AI-based PD-L1 scoring in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Directions of Immunotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treatment: Past, Present and Possible Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Development of a Novel IHC Assay for PD-L1 Detection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Monoclonal antibody immune therapy response instrument for stratification and cost-effective personalized approaches in 3PM-guided pan cancer management.The EPMA journal · 2025Review
- Comparison of PD-L1 Expression Between Preoperative Biopsy Specimens and Surgical Specimens in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Integrated Multi-Omics Approaches for Predicting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in NSCLC - Insights From Genomics, Proteomics, and Metabolomics.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I (MHC Class I) Expression Patterns and Their Pathologic Associations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Article
- Pembrolizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer-experiences from clinical practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- PD-L1 expression in squamous cervical carcinomas of Mozambican women living with or without HIV.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of SP263 and 22C3 pharmDx assays to test programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- The rapidly changing field of predictive biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2024Review
- [Consistency comparison of programmed cell death 1-ligand 1 in different immuno-histochemical staining methods].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PD-L1 harmonization studies revealed a strong correlation between the 22C3 and SP263 assays in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the assays’ characteristics have yet to be validated in a variety of clinical and analytical settings. The results of 431 NSCLC samples tested concurrently in routine clinical practice with the PD-L1 22C3 and SP263 assays were reviewed, and both assays were performed on 314 archives of surgically resected NSCLCs to assess PD-L1 expression in relation to variables such as FFPE block age and FFPE section storage condition. In routine clinical samples, 22C3 showed the highest concordance rate with 94.5% of SP263 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and 92.3% of SP263 TPS ≥1%, while SP263 showed a concordance rate with 79.6% of 22C3 TPS ≥50% and 89.9% of 22C3 TPS ≥1%. In the archival analysis, the high TPS of 22C3 and SP263 (versus TPS 1%) were significantly associated with a more recent block (<3 years versus ≥3 years) (p = 0.007 and p = 0.009, respectively). Only the TPS of 22C3 was reduced when FFPE sections were stored at room temperature compared to SP263. However, when stored at 4 °C, the storage duration had no effect on expression in either assay. For 22C3 TPS 1−49 percent and ≥50 percent (OR = 1.73, p = 0.006 and OR = 1.98, p = 0.002, respectively). There was a considerably larger chance of preserved 22C3 expression in recent room-temperature paraffin section storage, although SP263 demonstrated preserved expression in prolonged room-temperature section storage. Despite the good association between PD-L1 22C3 and SP263 in routine clinical samples, FFPE blocks older than 3 years and sections held at room temperature for more than 1 week may result in an underestimation of PD-L1 status, particularly for the 22C3 test. However, the SP263 assay was more sensitive under these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.