Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804896›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Feasibility and Acceptability of Bright IDEAS-Young Adults: A Problem-Solving Skills Training Intervention.

Adrienne S Viola, Gary Kwok, Kristine Levonyan-Radloff, Sharon L Manne, Robert B Noll, Sean Phipps, Olle Jane Z Sahler, Katie A Devine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adrienne S ViolaDepartment of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Gary KwokDepartment of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Kristine Levonyan-RadloffDepartment of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Sharon L ManneDepartment of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Robert B NollDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Sean PhippsPsychology Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Olle Jane Z SahlerDepartments of Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Health Humanities & Bioethics, and Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Katie A DevineDepartment of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1003-8905

Funding

Bright IDEAS-Young Adults: Problem-Solving Skills Training to Reduce Distress among Young Adults with CancerR37CA240807 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Katie A Devine · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA240807NCI NIH HHS R37CA240807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung adults with cancer are a vulnerable group with unique emotional, social, and practical needs. There is a lack of evidence-based interventions to address their needs and to foster skills that could increase their capacity to cope. Bright IDEAS is a problem-solving skills training intervention that has demonstrated efficacy in improving people's problem-solving ability and reducing distress among caregivers of children with cancer. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of Bright IDEAS adapted for young adults (Bright IDEAS-YA).

methodsForty young adults recently diagnosed with cancer were enrolled in a single arm feasibility study.

resultsFeasibility was demonstrated by the adequate enrollment (67.8%), retention (80.0%), and participants' adherence to the intervention (average of 5.2 out of 6 sessions completed). Participants reported satisfaction with the intervention. Qualitative feedback identified the systematic approach to problem-solving and interaction with the trainer as strengths of the intervention. Participants demonstrated improvements in problem-solving skills and symptoms of depression and anxiety.

conclusionsIn conclusion, the results support the feasibility of the intervention and an adequately powered randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the efficacy of the intervention on psychosocial outcomes.

Indexed as

behavioral interventionBright IDEAScancerdistressproblem-solving skillsyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID35804896
PMCPMC9264826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.