Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804836›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Paula Silva-Rodríguez, Daniel Fernández-Díaz, Manuel Bande, María Pardo, Lourdes Loidi, María José Blanco-Teijeiro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gene therapy for uveal melanoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Uveal Melanocytoma without GNAQ/GNA11 Mutations.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paula Silva-RodríguezFundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Clinical University Hospital, SERGAS, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Daniel Fernández-DíazTumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Manuel BandeTumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0386-4149
María PardoGrupo Obesidómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), CIBEROBN, ISCIII, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Lourdes LoidiFundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Clinical University Hospital, SERGAS, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María José Blanco-TeijeiroTumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III Grant PI16/00143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The

Indexed as

GNA11GNAQmutationoncogenesisprognosticationtherapiesuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID35804836
PMCPMC9264989
OpenAlexW4283330938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.