Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804656›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Large-Scale, High-Throughput Phenotyping of the Postharvest Storage Performance of 'Rustenburg' Navel Oranges and the Development of Shelf-Life Prediction Models.

Abiola Owoyemi, Ron Porat, Amnon Lichter, Adi Doron-Faigenboim, Omri Jovani, Noam Koenigstein, Yael Salzer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances Postharvest Preservation Technology.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abiola OwoyemiDepartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, ARO, The Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel.
Ron PoratDepartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, ARO, The Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6542-9524
Amnon LichterDepartment of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, ARO, The Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel.
Adi Doron-FaigenboimGenomics and Bioinformatics Unit, ARO, The Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel.
Omri JovaniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Noam KoenigsteinDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Yael SalzerDepartment of Growing, Production and Environmental Engineering, ARO, The Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion 7528809, Israel.
Agricultural Research Organization · ILTel Aviv University · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

The Israel Innovation Authority Grant number 70076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a large-scale, high-throughput phenotyping analysis of the effects of various pre-harvest and postharvest features on the quality of ‘Rustenburg’ navel oranges, in order to develop shelf-life prediction models to enable the use of the First Expired, First Out logistics strategy. The examined pre-harvest features included harvest time and yield, and the examined postharvest features included storage temperature, relative humidity during storage and duration of storage. All together, we evaluated 12,000 oranges (~4 tons) from six different orchards and conducted 170,576 measurements of 14 quality parameters. Storage time was found to be the most important feature affecting fruit quality, followed by storage temperature, harvest time, yield and humidity. The examined features significantly affected (p < 0.001) fruit weight loss, firmness, decay, color, peel damage, chilling injury, internal dryness, acidity, vitamin C and ethanol levels, and flavor and acceptance scores. Four regression models were evaluated for their ability to predict fruit quality based on pre-harvest and postharvest features. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) combined with a duplication approach was found to be the most effective approach. It allowed for the prediction of fruit-acceptance scores among the full data set, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.217 and an R2 of 0.891.

Indexed as

citrusintelligent logisticsmodelingorangepostharvest

Identifiers

PMID35804656
PMCPMC9266293
OpenAlexW4283382778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.