Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804596›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Growth and Welfare of Rainbow Trout (

Gloriana Cardinaletti, Patrizia Di Marco, Enrico Daniso, Maria Messina, Valeria Donadelli, Maria Grazia Finoia, Tommaso Petochi, Francesca Fava, Filippo Faccenda, Michela Contò and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of Alternative Protein and Lipid Sources for Rainbow Trout (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Dietary American Cockroach (Aquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gloriana CardinalettiDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (Di4A), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3553-9327
Patrizia Di MarcoItalian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), 00144 Rome, Italy.
Enrico DanisoDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (Di4A), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9771-2394
Maria MessinaDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (Di4A), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3217-1272
Valeria DonadelliItalian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), 00144 Rome, Italy.
Maria Grazia FinoiaItalian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), 00144 Rome, Italy.
Tommaso PetochiItalian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), 00144 Rome, Italy.
Francesca FavaFoundation Edmund Mach, Technology Transfer Centre, San Michele all'Adige, 38010 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-2152
Filippo FaccendaFoundation Edmund Mach, Technology Transfer Centre, San Michele all'Adige, 38010 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4871-8594
Michela ContòConsiglio per la ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca di Zootecnia e Aquacoltura, Monterotondo, 00015 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8244-1699
Roberto CerriDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (Di4A), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Donatella VolpattiDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (Di4A), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6300-1735
Chiara BulfonDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (Di4A), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Alberta MandichItalian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), 00144 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro LongobardiItalian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), 00144 Rome, Italy.
Giovanna MarinoItalian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), 00144 Rome, Italy.
Lina Fernanda Pulido-RodriguezDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Firenze, 50144 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6177-6310
Giuliana ParisiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Firenze, 50144 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4646-6036
Emilio TibaldiDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (Di4A), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale · ITUniversity of Udine · ITFondazione Edmund Mach · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

AGER Network Foundation project SUSHIN AGER2, Cod 2016-0112; 2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the nutrient-energy retention, digestive function, growth performance, and welfare of rainbow trout (ibw 54 g) fed isoproteic (42%), isolipidic (24%), fishmeal-free diets (CV) over 13 weeks. The diets consisted of plant-protein replacement with graded levels (10, 30, 60%) of protein from poultry by-product (PBM) and black soldier fly H. illucens pupae (BSFM) meals, either singly or in combination. A fishmeal-based diet was also tested (CF). Nitrogen retention improved with moderate or high levels of dietary PBM and BSFM relative to CV (p < 0.05). Gut brush border enzyme activity was poorly affected by the diets. Gastric chitinase was up-regulated after high BSFM feeding (p < 0.05). The gut peptide and amino acid transport genes were differently regulated by protein source and level. Serum cortisol was unaffected, and the changes in metabolites stayed within the physiological range. High PBM and high BSFM lowered the leukocyte respiratory burst activity and increased the lysozyme activity compared to CV (p < 0.05). The BSFM and PBM both significantly changed the relative percentage of lymphocytes and monocytes (p < 0.05). In conclusion, moderate to high PBM and BSFM inclusions in fishmeal-free diets, either singly or in combination, improved gut function and nutrient retention, resulting in better growth performance and the good welfare of the rainbow trout.

Indexed as

alternative proteinsdigestive functionHermetia illucensimmune responsenutrient retentionpoultry by-product mealrainbow troutstresssustainable feedwelfare

Identifiers

PMID35804596
PMCPMC9264821
OpenAlexW4283759398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.