Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804574›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Welfare Assessment of Invertebrates: Adapting the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG) for Zoo Decapods and Cephalopods.

Tanya M Narshi, Danielle Free, William S M Justice, Sarah Jayne Smith, Sarah Wolfensohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PsittaWel: A welfare assessment tool for companion parrots.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Considerations for implementing regulation of decapods in science.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2024
    Review
  8. Invisible Invertebrates: The Welfare of Invertebrates in Public Aquaria.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Assessing the Welfare of Captive Group-Housed Cockroaches,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Improving welfare assessment in aquaculture.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanya M NarshiInstitute of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Danielle FreeMarwell Wildlife, Colden Common, Winchester SO21 1JH, UK.
William S M JusticeMarwell Wildlife, Colden Common, Winchester SO21 1JH, UK.
Sarah Jayne SmithMarwell Wildlife, Colden Common, Winchester SO21 1JH, UK.
Sarah WolfensohnSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-3603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer demand for invertebrates is on the rise as their numbers in the wild dwindle. However, with the growing conservation efforts of modern zoos and aquariums, and evidence from over 300 studies showing that invertebrates are capable of sentience, public interest, and moral concern for welfare of invertebrates have increased. The challenge for zoos and aquariums is in developing an objective and repeatable method for evaluating welfare that can be applied to invertebrates in zoological collections. Recently introduced into zoological collection management is the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG). The AWAG helps to identify negative and positive welfare states, through assessing animal- and environmental-based indicators to make changes that lead to a better quality of life. Originally developed for the assessment of laboratory primates, the system has been successfully adapted to assess a variety of taxa across different environments, facilitated by the development of cloud-based software. In this study, the AWAG has been adapted to assess the cumulative lifetime experience of captive decapods and cephalopods at two different institutions, Marwell Zoo and National Marine Aquarium. This study has provided further evidence that the AWAG is adaptable and demonstrates the first time any objective scoring system has been successfully adapted for use in invertebrates. Through graphical representation, the results show that the AWAG identifies changes in welfare scores that can be attributed to specific events and can be used to predict the future vulnerability of species to welfare changes and suggest alternative management methods. This monitoring tool provides a versatile method of implementing practical welfare monitoring in zoos and aquariums.

Indexed as

animal welfare assessment gridcaptive lifetime experiencecephalopoddecapodinvertebratespublic aquariaquality of lifesentiencewelfarezoological collections

Identifiers

PMID35804574
PMCPMC9264806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.