Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804410›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

Mechanisms of processing speed training and transfer effects across the adult lifespan: protocol of a multi-site cognitive training study.

Claudia C von Bastian, Alice Reinhartz, Robert C Udale, Stéphanie Grégoire, Mehdi Essounni, Sylvie Belleville, Tilo Strobach

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Claudia C von BastianDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield, S1 2LT, UK. c.c.vonbastian@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0667-2460
Alice ReinhartzMedical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Robert C UdaleDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield, S1 2LT, UK.
Stéphanie GrégoireCentre de Recherche de L'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), Montréal, Canada.
Mehdi EssounniCentre de Recherche de L'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), Montréal, Canada.
Sylvie BellevilleCentre de Recherche de L'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CRIUGM), Montréal, Canada.
Tilo StrobachMedical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DEUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft STR 1223/10-1Economic and Social Research Council ES/V013610/1Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 2004-2020-0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, cognitive training has gained popularity as a cost-effective and accessible intervention aiming at compensating for or even counteracting age-related cognitive declines during adulthood. Whereas the evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive training in general is inconsistent, processing speed training has been a notable successful exception, showing promising generalized benefits in untrained tasks and everyday cognitive functioning. The goal of this study is to investigate why and when processing speed training can lead to transfer across the adult lifespan. Specifically, we will test (1) whether training-induced changes in the rate of evidence accumulation underpin transfer to cognitive performance in untrained contexts, and (2) whether these transfer effects increase with stronger attentional control demands of the training tasks.

methodsWe will employ a multi-site, longitudinal, double-blinded and actively controlled study design with a target sample size of N = 400 adult participants between 18 and 85 years old. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three processing speed training interventions with varying attentional control demands (choice reaction time, switching, or dual tasks) which will be compared to an active control group training simple reaction time tasks with minimal attentional control demands. All groups will complete 10 home-based training sessions comprising three tasks. Training gains, near transfer to the untrained tasks of the other groups, and far transfer to working memory, inhibitory control, reasoning, and everyday cognitive functioning will be assessed in the laboratory directly before, immediately after, and three months after training (i.e., pretest, posttest, and follow-up, respectively). We will estimate the rate of evidence accumulation (drift rate) with diffusion modeling and conduct latent-change score modeling for hypothesis testing. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to identifying the cognitive processes that change when training speeded tasks with varying attentional control demands across the adult lifespan. A better understanding of how processing speed training affects specific cognitive mechanisms will enable researchers to maximize the effectiveness of cognitive training in producing broad transfer to psychologically meaningful everyday life outcomes. Trial registration Open Science Framework Registries, registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/J5G7E ; date of registration: 9 May 2022.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersLongevityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttentionCognitionHumansMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultAdult LifespanAttentional controlCognitive trainingDiffusion modelingDrift rateLatent-variable modelingProcessing speedStudy protocolTraining gainsTransfer gains

Identifiers

PMID35804410
PMCPMC9270821
OpenAlexW4284973599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.