Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804344›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Health-promoting factors among students in higher education within health care and social work: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data in a multicentre longitudinal study.

Inger Ahlstrand, Ingrid Larsson, Margaretha Larsson, Aimée Ekman, Lena Hedén, Katja Laakso, Ulrika Lindmark, Håkan Nunstedt, Lena Oxelmark, Sandra Pennbrant and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. eHealth Literacy and Knowledge of Social Health Financing Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Kenya.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Inger Ahlstrand *Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-8353
Ingrid Larsson *School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Box 823, S-30118, Halmstad, Sweden. Ingrid.larsson@hh.se.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-660X
Margaretha Larsson *School of Health and Education, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7368-953X
Aimée EkmanDepartment of Social Work, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3801-0541
Lena HedénFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7067-2687
Katja LaaksoInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulrika LindmarkDepartment of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2786-707X
Håkan NunstedtDepartment of Health Sciences, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5219-6031
Lena OxelmarkInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8397-7252
Sandra PennbrantDepartment of Health Sciences, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2793-9937
Annelie J SundlerFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9194-3244
Jenny Hallgren *School of Health and Education, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1819-0896
Jönköping University · SEUniversity of Borås · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Skövde · SEUniversity West · SEHalmstad University · SEKarlstad University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEducational environments are considered important in strengthening students' health status and knowledge, which are associated with good educational outcomes. It has been suggested to establish healthy universities based on a salutogenic approach - namely, health promotion. The aim of this study was to describe health-promoting resources and factors among first-semester students in higher education in healthcare and social work.

methodsThis cross-sectional study is based on a survey distributed among all students in seven healthcare and social work programmes at six universities in southern Sweden. The survey was carried out in 2018 using a self-reported, web-based questionnaire focussing on general health and well-being, lifestyle factors together with three validated instruments measuring health-promoting factors and processes: the Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale, Salutogenic Health Indicator Scale (SHIS) and Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ).

resultsOf 2283 students, 851 (37.3%) completed the survey, of whom 742 (87.1%) were women; 722 (84.8%) were enrolled on healthcare programmes, and 129 (15.2%) were enrolled on social work programmes. Most reported good general health and well-being (88.1% and 83.7%, respectively). The total mean scores for the SOC scale, SHIS and OBQ were, respectively, 59.09 (SD = 11.78), 44.04 (SD = 9.38) and 26.40 (SD = 7.07). Well-being and several healthy lifestyles were related to better general health and higher SOC, SHIS and OBQ scores. Multiple linear and logistic regressions showed that perceived well-being and no sleeping problems significantly predicted higher general health and higher SOC, SHIS and OBQ scores. Being less sedentary and non-smoking habits were significant predictors of higher SOC.

conclusionsSwedish students in higher education within the healthcare and social work sector report good general health and well-being in the first semester, as well as health-promoting resources (i.e. SOC, SHIS and OBQ), and in some aspects, a healthy lifestyle. High-intensity exercise, no sleeping problems and non-smoking seem to be of importance to both general health and health-promotive resources. This study contributes to knowledge about the health promotive characteristics of students in the healthcare and social work fields, which is of importance for planning universities with a salutogenic approach.

Indexed as

Sense of CoherenceCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSocial WorkStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth and health-promoting resourcesHealth behaviorHealthy lifestylesHigher educationOccupational Balance QuestionnaireSalutogenesisSalutogenic Health Indicator ScaleSense of coherenceStudents’ health

Identifiers

PMID35804344
PMCPMC9270798
OpenAlexW4284975708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.