Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804326›Full record

ArticleBMC genomic data2022

A detailed workflow to develop QIIME2-formatted reference databases for taxonomic analysis of DNA metabarcoding data.

Benjamin Dubois, Frédéric Debode, Louis Hautier, Julie Hulin, Gilles San Martin, Alain Delvaux, Eric Janssen, Dominique Mingeot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomic data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oral Administration ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin DuboisLife Sciences Department, Bioengineering Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Chaussée de Charleroi 234, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium. b.dubois@cra.wallonie.be.
Frédéric DebodeLife Sciences Department, Bioengineering Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Chaussée de Charleroi 234, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Louis HautierLife Sciences Department, Plant and Forest Health Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Rue de Liroux 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Julie HulinKnowledge and Valorization of Agricultural Products Department, Quality and Authentication Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Chaussée de Namur 24, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Gilles San MartinLife Sciences Department, Plant and Forest Health Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Rue de Liroux 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Alain DelvauxKnowledge and Valorization of Agricultural Products Department, Protection, Control Products and Residues Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Rue du Bordia 11, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Eric JanssenKnowledge and Valorization of Agricultural Products Department, Quality and Authentication Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Chaussée de Namur 24, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Dominique MingeotLife Sciences Department, Bioengineering Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Center, Chaussée de Charleroi 234, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe DNA metabarcoding approach has become one of the most used techniques to study the taxa composition of various sample types. To deal with the high amount of data generated by the high-throughput sequencing process, a bioinformatics workflow is required and the QIIME2 platform has emerged as one of the most reliable and commonly used. However, only some pre-formatted reference databases dedicated to a few barcode sequences are available to assign taxonomy. If users want to develop a new custom reference database, several bottlenecks still need to be addressed and a detailed procedure explaining how to develop and format such a database is currently missing. In consequence, this work is aimed at presenting a detailed workflow explaining from start to finish how to develop such a curated reference database for any barcode sequence.

resultsWe developed DB4Q2, a detailed workflow that allowed development of plant reference databases dedicated to ITS2 and rbcL, two commonly used barcode sequences in plant metabarcoding studies. This workflow addresses several of the main bottlenecks connected with the development of a curated reference database. The detailed and commented structure of DB4Q2 offers the possibility of developing reference databases even without extensive bioinformatics skills, and avoids 'black box' systems that are sometimes encountered. Some filtering steps have been included to discard presumably fungal and misidentified sequences. The flexible character of DB4Q2 allows several key sequence processing steps to be included or not, and downloading issues can be avoided. Benchmarking the databases developed using DB4Q2 revealed that they performed well compared to previously published reference datasets.

conclusionThis study presents DB4Q2, a detailed procedure to develop custom reference databases in order to carry out taxonomic analyses with QIIME2, but also with other bioinformatics platforms if desired. This work also provides ready-to-use plant ITS2 and rbcL databases for which the prediction accuracy has been assessed and compared to that of other published databases.

Indexed as

DNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicComputational BiologyPlantsWorkflowDNABioinformatics workflowHigh-throughput sequencingITS2MetabarcodingPlantQIIME2rbcLReference database

Identifiers

PMID35804326
PMCPMC9264521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.