Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804308›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women.

Elke Deherder, Ilse Delbaere, Adriana Macedo, Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze, Sven Van Laere, Katrien Beeckman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Maternal perspective on requesting elective caesarean birth.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elke DeherderVIVES University of Applied Sciences, Doorniksesteenweg 145, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium. elke.deherder@vives.be.
Ilse DelbaereVIVES University of Applied Sciences, Doorniksesteenweg 145, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Adriana MacedoStudent master management and policy of health care, department of Public Health and Nursing and Midwifery Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Marianne J NieuwenhuijzeResearch Centre for Midwifery Science Maastricht, Zuyd University / CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Sven Van LaereVrije Universiteit Brussel, Interfaculty Center Data processing & Statistics, Laarbeeklaan, 103, Brussels, Belgium.
Katrien BeeckmanVrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Public Health, Nursing and Midwifery Research Unit, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care providers have an important role to share evidence based information and empower patients to make informed choices. Previous studies indicate that shared decision making in pregnancy and childbirth may have an important impact on a woman's birth experience. In Flemish social media, a large number of women expressed their concern about their birth experience, where they felt loss of control and limited possibilities to make their own choices. The aim of this study is to explore autonomy and shared decision making in the Flemish population.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional, non-interventional study to explore the birth experience of Flemish women. A self-assembled questionnaire was used to collect data, including the Pregnancy and Childbirth Questionnaire (PCQ), the Labor Agentry Scale (LAS), the Mothers Autonomy Decision Making Scale (MADM), the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q9) and four questions on preparation for childbirth. Women who gave birth two to 12 months ago were recruited by means of social media in the Flemish area (Northern part of Belgium). Linear mixed-effect modelling with backwards variable selection was applied to examine relations with autonomy in decision making.

resultsIn total, 1029 mothers participated in this study of which 617 filled out the survey completely. In general, mothers experienced moderate autonomy in decision-making, both with an obstetrician and with a midwife with an average on the MADM score of respectively 18.5 (± 7.2) and 29.4 (±10.4) out of 42. The linear mixed-effects model showed a relationship between autonomy in decision-making (MADM) for the type of healthcare provider (p < 0.001), the level of self-control during labour and birth (LAS) (p = 0.003), the level of perceived quality of care (PCQ) (p < 0.001), having epidural analgesia during childbirth (p = 0.026) and feeling to have received sufficient information about the normal course of childbirth (p < 0.001).

conclusionsChildbearing women in Flanders experience moderate levels of autonomy in decision- making with their health care providers, where lower autonomy was observed for obstetricians compared to midwives. Future research should focus more on why differences occur between obstetrics and midwives in terms of autonomy and shared decision-making as perceived by the mother.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedMidwiferyBelgiumCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyautonomychildbirthpregnancyshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID35804308
PMCPMC9264300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.