Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804306›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Opioid prescribing in general practice: an Australian cross-sectional survey.

Sharon Reid, Carolyn Day, Natalie White, Christopher Harrison, Paul Haber, Clare Bayram

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon ReidSpeciality of Addiction Medicine, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. sharon.reid@sydney.edu.au.
Carolyn DaySpeciality of Addiction Medicine, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Natalie WhiteSpeciality of Addiction Medicine, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Christopher HarrisonMenzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Paul HaberSpeciality of Addiction Medicine, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Clare BayramMenzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUSydney Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribed opioid doses > 100 mg oral morphine equivalent (OME) and/or co-prescribing of sedating psychoactive medications increase the risk of unintentional fatal overdose. We describe general practice encounters where opioids are prescribed and examine high-risk opioid prescribing.

methodsThe 2006-2016 BEACH study data, a rolling national cross-sectional survey of randomly selected GPs, was analysed.

resultsOpioid prescribing increased 2006-2007 to 2015-2016, however, this plateaued across the latter half-decade. From 2012-2016 3,897 GPs recorded 389,700 encounters and at least one opioid was prescribed at 5.2%. Opioid encounters more likely involved males, those 45-64 years, concession card holders and the socioeconomically disadvantaged. GPs more likely to prescribe opioids were 55 years or older, male, Australian graduates, and in regional and remote areas. The most common problems managed with opioids involved chronic non-cancer pain. One-in-ten opioid prescribing episodes involved high-risk doses and 11% involved co-prescription of sedating psychoactive medications. Over one-third of GPs provided other (non-pharmacological) interventions at encounters with opioid prescriptions.

conclusionsOnly 5% of GP encounters involved an opioid prescription. Of concern, were: prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain, potentially high-risk opioid encounters where > 100 OME daily dose was prescribed, and/or there was co-prescription of sedating psychoactive medication. However, approximately one-in-three opioid prescribing encounters involved non-pharmacological interventions.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidGeneral PracticePractice Patterns, Physicians'AustraliaChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepineChronic non-cancer painGeneral practiceGeneral practitionerOpioid prescribingPrescription opioid

Identifiers

PMID35804306
PMCPMC9264661
OpenAlexW4284966804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.