Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804298›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2022

In vitro assessment of 17 antimicrobial agents against clinical Mycobacterium avium complex isolates.

Siran Lin, Wenya Hua, Shiyong Wang, Yu Zhang, Xinchang Chen, Hong Liu, Lingyun Shao, Jiazhen Chen, Wenhong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Macrolide-resistantJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Mutations in theMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pediatric Submandibular Lymphadenitis Caused byInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Efficacies of sequenced monotherapies ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. TheMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  11. Microbial Clearance of RefractoryPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Isolation of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Differences in Drug-Susceptibility Patterns betweenAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Variability ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siran Lin *Department of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wenya Hua *Department of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shiyong WangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xinchang ChenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hong LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lingyun ShaoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiazhen ChenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jiazhen_chen@163.com.
Wenhong ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, National Medical Center for Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CNHuashan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections have been increasing, especially in immunocompromised and older adults. The rapid increase has triggered a global health concern due to limited therapeutic strategies and adverse effects caused by long-term medication. To provide more evidence for the treatment of MAC, we studied the in vitro inhibitory activities of 17 antimicrobial agents against clinical MAC isolates.

resultsA total of 111 clinical MAC isolates were enrolled in the study and they were identified as M. intracellulare, M. avium, M. marseillense, M. colombiense, M. yongonense, and two isolates could not be identified at the species level. MAC strains had relatively low (0-21.6%) resistance to clarithromycin, amikacin, bedaquiline, rifabutin, streptomycin, and clofazimine, and the resistant rates to isoniazid, rifampin, linezolid, doxycycline, and ethionamide were very high (72.1-100%). In addition, M. avium had a significantly higher resistance rate than that of M. intracellulare for ethambutol (92.3% vs 40.7%, P < 0.001), amikacin (15.4% vs 1.2%, P = 0.049), and cycloserine (69.2% vs 25.9%, P = 0.004).

conclusionsOur results supported the current usage of macrolides, rifabutin, and aminoglycosides in the regimens for MAC infection, and also demonstrated the low resistance rate against new drugs, such as clofazimine, tedizolid, and bedaquiline, suggesting the possible implementation of these drugs in MAC treatment.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsMycobacterium avium-intracellulare InfectionAgedAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsClarithromycinClofazimineHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium avium ComplexRifabutinAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsClarithromycinClofazimineRifabutinDrug susceptibility testMinimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)Mycobacterium aviumMycobacterium avium complex (MAC)Mycobacterium intracellulare

Identifiers

PMID35804298
PMCPMC9264595
OpenAlexW4284883442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.