ArticleBMC genomics2022
Comparative genomic analysis of the human genome and six bat genomes using unsupervised machine learning: Mb-level CpG and TFBS islands.
Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Structural and biochemical insights of xylose MFS and SWEET transporters in microbial cell factories: challenges to lignocellulosic hydrolysates fermentation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmerging infectious disease-causing RNA viruses, such as the SARS-CoV-2 and Ebola viruses, are thought to rely on bats as natural reservoir hosts. Since these zoonotic viruses pose a great threat to humans, it is important to characterize the bat genome from multiple perspectives. Unsupervised machine learning methods for extracting novel information from big sequence data without prior knowledge or particular models are highly desirable for obtaining unexpected insights. We previously established a batch-learning self-organizing map (BLSOM) of the oligonucleotide composition that reveals novel genome characteristics from big sequence data.
resultsIn this study, using the oligonucleotide BLSOM, we conducted a comparative genomic study of humans and six bat species. BLSOM is an explainable-type machine learning algorithm that reveals the diagnostic oligonucleotides contributing to sequence clustering (self-organization). When unsupervised machine learning reveals unexpected and/or characteristic features, these features can be studied in more detail via the much simpler and more direct standard distribution map method. Based on this combined strategy, we identified the Mb-level enrichment of CG dinucleotide (Mb-level CpG islands) around the termini of bat long-scaffold sequences. In addition, a class of CG-containing oligonucleotides were enriched in the centromeric and pericentromeric regions of human chromosomes. Oligonucleotides longer than tetranucleotides often represent binding motifs for a wide variety of proteins (e.g., transcription factor binding sequences (TFBSs)). By analyzing the penta- and hexanucleotide composition, we observed the evident enrichment of a wide range of hexanucleotide TFBSs in centromeric and pericentromeric heterochromatin regions on all human chromosomes.
conclusionFunction of transcription factors (TFs) beyond their known regulation of gene expression (e.g., TF-mediated looping interactions between two different genomic regions) has received wide attention. The Mb-level TFBS and CpG islands are thought to be involved in the large-scale nuclear organization, such as centromere and telomere clustering. TFBSs, which are enriched in centromeric and pericentromeric heterochromatin regions, are thought to play an important role in the formation of nuclear 3D structures. Our machine learning-based analysis will help us to understand the differential features of nuclear 3D structures in the human and bat genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.