Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804237›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2022

Obesity and Bariatric Surgery in Australia: Future Projection of Supply and Demand, and Costs.

Sithara Wanni Arachchige Dona, Mary Rose Angeles, Dieu Nguyen, Lan Gao, Martin Hensher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Up-to-date literature review and issues of sedation during digestive endoscopy.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sithara Wanni Arachchige DonaDeakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Mary Rose AngelesDeakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Dieu NguyenDeakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Lan GaoDeakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
Martin HensherMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Medical Sciences Precinct, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. m.c.hensher@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6444-6827
Deakin University · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevalence of obesity is increasing in developed countries, including Australia. There is evidence that bariatric surgery is effective in losing weight and reducing risk of chronic diseases. However, access to bariatric surgery remains limited in the public health sector.

methodWe modelled population-based estimates of the likely numbers of people eligible for bariatric surgery in Australia using the recent Australian New Zealand Metabolic and Obesity Surgery Society (ANZMOSS) framework and estimated the potential costs that would be incurred from primary and subsequent reoperations in both public and private sector.

resultsThe annual number of newly eligible patients is expected to rise, and hence the gap in demand is increasing relative to current baseline supply. If a 5-year program to treat all currently eligible patients was implemented, the maximum yearly demand is projected to be 341,343 primary surgeries, more than eight times the existing capacity of public and private sector, which can only offer 41,534 surgeries/year. A nine-fold increase is expected if we treat currently eligible patients over a 5-year program and all newly eligible patients as they occur each year.

conclusionOur results highlighted the currently highly skewed distribution of bariatric surgeries between the private and public sectors. Improving access would bring substantial benefits to many Australians, given the demonstrated cost-effectiveness and cost savings. This requires a major increase in resourcing for publicly-funded access to bariatric surgery in the first instance. A national review of priorities and resourcing for all modes of obesity treatment is required in Australia.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidAustraliaCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansObesityBariatric surgeryCostsEligibilitySupply and demand

Identifiers

PMID35804237
PMCPMC9392713
OpenAlexW4284963938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.