ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2022
Caring for our caretakers: building resiliency in NICU parents and staff.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stress, coping, protective factors, and quality of life in parents of infants with CHD: associations with state anxiety.Cardiology in the young · 2026Article
- Strengthening the Neonatal Workforce Through World Café Methodology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Family Functioning and Parent Behavioural Changes Post-Admission to the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.Nursing in critical care · 2025Article
- NICU Parent and Staff Advocacy to Address Parental Mental Health.Clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- The impact of mindfulness training on emotional resilience and job engagement among NICU and PICU Saudi and Egyptian nurses: a quasi experimental comparative study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- A biopsychosocial model of NICU family adjustment and child development.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a high-acuity, stressful unit for both parents and staff. Up to 50% of mothers and partners experience emotional distress (i.e., depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress) during NICU hospitalization and 30-60% continue to experience distress after discharge. Similarly, up to 50% of NICU staff report burnout and emotional distress. Although healthcare providers have developed interdisciplinary guidelines to enhance psychosocial resources for parents and staff, standardized psychosocial services are lacking. The purpose of this short communication is to describe: (1) the need for psychosocial interventions for NICU parents and staff; (2) existent psychosocial programs and their gaps and limitations; and (3) future directions for psychosocial care in NICU settings. We reviewed the current literature and propose a new conceptual model to inform psychosocial interventions for the NICU. We argue that brief, evidence-based, resiliency, and relationship-based programs are needed to enhance parent and staff outcomes and, ultimately, child development and the NICU unit culture.
conclusionGiven the lack of standardized psychosocial care, new interventions for NICU families and staff are needed more than ever. Resiliency, relationship-based interventions that leverage multidisciplinary support may be an innovative way to enhance NICU outcomes and care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • 40-50% of parents in the NICU report elevated emotional distress and 30-50% of staff report burnout. • Psychosocial interventions for parents and staff are needed, yet lacking. WHAT IS NEW: • Interventions that focus on resiliency and relationships may improve the culture of the NICU. • New multidisciplinary collaborations and approaches are needed to improve implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.