Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804148›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2022

Sample size calculations for continuous outcomes in clinical nutrition.

Christian Ritz, Mette Frahm Olsen, Benedikte Grenov, Henrik Friis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian RitzNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, DK-1455, Copenhagen K, Denmark. ritz@sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5095-0624
Mette Frahm OlsenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Benedikte GrenovDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Henrik FriisDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nutrition research, sample size calculations for continuous outcomes are important for the planning phase of many randomized trials and could also be relevant for some observational studies such as cohort and cross-sectional studies. However, only little literature dedicated to this topic exists within nutritional science. This article reviews the most common methods for sample size calculations in nutrition research. Approximate formulas are used for explaining concepts and requirements and for working through examples from the literature. Sample size calculations for the various study designs, which are covered, may all be seen as extensions of the sample size calculation for the basic two-group comparison through the application of suitable scaling factors and, possibly, modification of the significance level. The latter is needed for sample size calculations for multi-group designs and designs involving multiple primary outcomes. Like cluster-randomized designs, these types of study designs may be more challenging than standard sample size calculations. In such non-standard scenarios, there may be a need for consulting a biostatistician. Finally, it should be stressed that there may be many ways to plan a study. The final sample size calculation provided for a grant applicant, study protocol, or publication will often not only depend on considerations and input information as described in this article but will also involve restrictions in terms of logistics and/or resources.

Indexed as

Research DesignCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSample Size

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.