Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35804120›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2022

Considerations for restorative dentistry secondary care referrals - part 1: defining strategic importance.

Don S Jayawardena, Reem Ahmed, Jacob Watts, Joanne Cunliffe, James Darcey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Don S JayawardenaDental Core Trainee, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge St, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK.
Reem AhmedSpeciality Registrar in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge St, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK. reem.ahmed@mft.nhs.uk.
Jacob WattsDental Core Trainee, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge St, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK.
Joanne CunliffeConsultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge St, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK.
James DarceyConsultant in Restorative Dentistry, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge St, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategic importance is an essential concept for dental service providers. It allows clinicians to differentiate treatment needs on both a patient level and a health care commissioning level, not simply based upon complexity alone. On a patient level, it influences both the clinician's and patient's decision as to whether a tooth/teeth should be restored, as well as determining the possible need for specialist input. On a commissioning level, it facilitates the prioritisation of limited resources.Strategic importance can be considered at a patient level, taking into factors such as age, tolerance to treatment and the patient's choice. It can also be considered at a mouth level, accounting for factors such as its impact on function and aesthetics function. All these factors together can influence the decision as to whether complex treatment is warranted on a given tooth, especially in a healthcare model where the allocation of limited resources is necessary.

Indexed as

Esthetics, DentalSecondary Health CareDental Restoration, PermanentDentistryHumansReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID35804120
PMCPMC9264738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.