Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities.

Filipe A B Sousa, Fúlvia B Manchado-Gobatto, Natália de A Rodrigues, Gustavo G de Araujo, Claudio A Gobatto

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Filipe A B SousaSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil. filipe.sousa@iefe.ufal.br.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-725X

Fúlvia B Manchado-GobattoSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-570X

Natália de A RodriguesSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4265-9586

Gustavo G de AraujoLaboratory of Applied Sports Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4609-069X

Claudio A GobattoSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas, Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-7582

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to test the agreement of the incremental test's physiological responses between tethered running on a nonmotorized treadmill (NMT) to matched relative intensities while running on a conventional motorized treadmill (MT). Using a within-subject crossover design, nine male recreational runners (age = 22 ± 5 years; height = 175 ± 6 cm; weight = 68.0 ± 16.6 kg) underwent two test sessions: one was an incremental intensity protocol on an MT; the other was on an instrumented NMT. Intensity thresholds at [Formula: see text]O

Indexed as

Oxygen ConsumptionRunningAdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesExercise TestHeart RateHumansLactic AcidMaleYoung AdultLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID35804037

DOI10.1038/s41598-022-13741-w

PMCPMC9270331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.