ArticleEye (London, England)2023
Periocular basal cell carcinoma recurrence following surgical treatment: Safe surveillance time.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors associated with recurrence in periocular basal cell carcinoma in a Taiwanese population.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Long-term results after surgical basal cell carcinoma excision in the eyelid region: revisited.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
- Recurrence rates of periocular basal cell carcinoma following intra-operative en-face frozen section margin controlled excision.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Prediction of Diagnostic Gene Biomarkers Associated with Immune Infiltration for Basal Cell Carcinoma.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022Article
- Primary periocular basal cell carcinoma: recurrence, risk factors and follow-up.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo report the rate of primary periocular BCC recurrence following surgical excision in low-risk and high-risk BCCs, and to propose long term follow up guidelines.
methodsRetrospective case series of primary BCC treated with surgical excision (Mohs micrographic surgery [MMS], wide local excision [WLE] or fast paraffin excision) who have histologically-confirmed BCC subtype and histologically-measured tumour clearance margins.
results77 patients (78 eyelids) were included. Mean age was 72.0 ± 12.8 years with a female predominance (42, 54.5%). Most common histological BCC subtype was nodular (39, 50.0%). 44 (56.47.1%) patients underwent MMS. Tumour clearance was achieved in 59 (75.6%) eyelids after one surgery. 9 had further surgery to achieve tumour clearance while 10 were monitored. There was no statistical significance between recurrence rates in patients who had tumour clearance compared with patients with incomplete tumour clearance after initial surgery (p = 0.15). In patients with incomplete tumour clearance, there was no statistical significance between recurrence rates in those who underwent further surgery versus those monitored (p = 0.47). Average follow-up duration was 37.9 ± 17.2 months. Three (3.9%) cases had recurrent BCC. All three cases had high-risk BCC features (infiltrative subtypes and/or incomplete tumour excision after initial surgery).
conclusionsThere was no evidence of recurrence of completely excised, low-risk BCCs at three years, regardless of type of surgical excision. We recommend patients with completely excised, primary BCCs without high-risk features be monitored for one year. Patients with any high-risk BCC features, such as incompletely excised tumours or high-risk histological subtypes, should be monitored for five years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.