Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35803915›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Effectiveness and protection duration of Covid-19 vaccines and previous infection against any SARS-CoV-2 infection in young adults.

Lior Rennert, Zichen Ma, Christopher S McMahan, Delphine Dean

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lior RennertDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. liorr@clemson.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5275-7273
Zichen MaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Christopher S McMahanSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Delphine DeanDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-2640
Clemson University · US

Funding

Tissue Structural and Neural Remodeling in Human Sacroiliac JointP20GM121342 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI Peng Chen · 2018 to 2026
$24.7M
Impact of Integrated HIV/NCD Screening on HIV Testing Uptake and Engagement in HIV Care: An RCT in Kisarawe, TanzanizR01MH111366 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SWEAT, MICHAEL D · 2016 to 2021
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121342NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data on effectiveness and protection duration of Covid-19 vaccines and previous infection against general SARS-CoV-2 infection in general populations are limited. Here we evaluate protection from Covid-19 vaccination (primary series) and previous infection in 21,261 university students undergoing repeated surveillance testing between 8/8/2021-12/04/2021, during which B.1.617 (delta) was the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant. Estimated mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and AD26.COV2.S effectiveness against any SARS-CoV-2 infection is 75.4% (95% CI: 70.5-79.5), 65.7% (95% CI: 61.1-69.8), and 42.8% (95% CI: 26.1-55.8), respectively. Among previously infected individuals, protection is 72.9% when unvaccinated (95% CI: 66.1-78.4) and increased by 22.1% with full vaccination (95% CI: 15.8-28.7). Statistically significant decline in protection is observed for mRNA-1273 (P < .001), BNT162b2 (P < .001), but not Ad26.CoV2.S (P = 0.40) or previous infection (P = 0.12). mRNA vaccine protection dropped 29.7% (95% CI: 17.9-41.6) six months post- vaccination, from 83.2% to 53.5%. We conclude that the 2-dose mRNA vaccine series initially offers strong protection against general SARS-CoV-2 infection caused by the delta variant in young adults, but protection substantially decreases over time. These findings indicate that vaccinated individuals may still contribute to community spread. While previous SARS-CoV-2 infection consistently provides moderately strong protection against repeat infection from delta, vaccination yields a substantial increase in protection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansmRNA VaccinesSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, SyntheticYoung AdultBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35803915
PMCPMC9263799
OpenAlexW4284892137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.