Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35803873›Full record

ArticleActas urologicas espanolas2022

Online surgical education adopted among urology residency programs in response to COVID-19: A pilot study.

Z M Connelly, R Abou Ghayda, T Paneque, J Gómez Rivas, F Esperto, A Azzawe, J Orzel, M Kathrins, M E Ahmed, N Khater

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Actas urologicas espanolas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Z M ConnellyDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, United States.
R Abou GhaydaUrology Institute, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
T PanequeDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, United States.
J Gómez RivasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
F EspertoDepartment of Urology, Campus Biomedico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
A AzzaweDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, United States.
J OrzelGeorgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC, United States.
M KathrinsDepartment of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
M E AhmedDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
N KhaterDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, United States. Electronic address: nazih.khater@lsuhs.edu.
Georgetown University · USHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand the residents' perceptions of the, COVID-19 driven, newly implemented online learning systems adopted among accredited urology residency programs nationwide, and their sustainability following the pandemic era. MATERIALS AND

methodsA survey was designed and dispersed to urology program coordinators and directors to distribute to their residents. In the survey, Online education models was the all-encompassing term to describe any form of resident education that occurred online. Anonymous surveys were exported from Survey Monkey and data was analyzed for statistical significance.

resultsOver 70% of urology residents agreed or were neutral to the statement that Online education models were equivalent to in-person learning. Only 13% of residents stated that online learning should not be continued following the pandemic. Several different parameters were assessed, and only 5 of them showed statistical significance. Stress, personal engagement, interpersonal communication efficiency and non-verbal cues were all lower with online education models. The only attribute that was scored higher by residents was network connectivity issues.

conclusionsAn overwhelming majority of urology residents in the United States believe Online education models should continue to be adopted once the pandemic is over.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceInternship and ResidencyUrologyHumansPilot ProjectsUnited StatesCOVID-19Educación de residentes de urologíaEducation sustainabilityModelos de educación en líneaOnline education modelsSatisfacción de los residentes de urologíaSostenibilidad de la educaciónUrology resident satisfactionUrology residents’ education

Identifiers

PMID35803873
PMCPMC9256518
OpenAlexW4283835506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.