Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35803674›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2023

Characterising advertising strategies and expenditures for conventional and newer smokeless tobacco products.

Sherry L Emery, Steven Binns, Chandler C Carter, Shyanika W Rose, Ganna Kostygina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence of Nicotine Pouch Use Among Youth and Adults in Great Britain-Analysis of Cross-Sectional, Nationally Representative Surveys.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Potential Impact of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Public Health: A Scoping Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Tax Incidence and Tax Pass-Through of Smokeless Tobacco in the US.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prioritizing Common Terminology and Measures to Advance Research on Oral Nicotine Product Use.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sherry L EmeryPublic Health, NORC, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-9990
Steven BinnsPublic Health, NORC, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8573-107X
Chandler C CarterPublic Health, NORC, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Shyanika W RoseBehavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4200-1197
Ganna KostyginaPublic Health, NORC, Chicago, Illinois, USA kostygina-anna@norc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8416-6168

Funding

Assessing the Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Influencer Marketing in the Rapidly Changing Media EnvironmentR01CA234082 · NCI · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOSTYGINA, GANNA · 2019 to 2021
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA234082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNicotine pouch products are an emerging and rapidly growing smokeless tobacco (ST) category in the USA. Little is known about the promotional strategies and media channels used to advertise this ST category or the extent to which the marketing strategies differ from strategies used to promote 'conventional' smokeless products (eg, snuff). We describe the nature, timing of and expenditures related to conventional, snus and newer ST product advertising on print, broadcast and internet media.

methodsAdvertising expenditures were collected using Kantar Media's 'Stradegy' tool, which provides advertising data including dollars spent promoting specific products across various media channels, including print magazines and newspapers, broadcast television and radio, outdoor posters and billboards, and internet. We identified 306 smokeless products within Kantar database and collected ad expenditures retrospectively for January 2018-April 2020. Promotional expenditures were aggregated by product category, by month and by designated market area (DMA).

resultsKantar data analysis returned 28 conventional ST, 22 oral nicotine and 3 snus products (53 total) advertised during the period of observation, with over $71 million spent collectively on ST promotion. Across categories, more advertising dollars were spent on conventional ST products (63%) than newer oral nicotine products (25%) or snus (12%). However, during the later 9-month period from August 2019 to April 2020, oral nicotine products accounted for the majority of monthly ad spending. Most ad spending was placed in the national market ($66.5 million), with Atlanta ($1.1 million), Houston ($1 million) and Las Vegas ($0.8 million) as the top three local DMAs for expenditures. DISCUSSION: Advertising expenditures for nicotine pouches have recently exceeded conventional ST product advertising and nicotine pouches are being promoted nationally. Marketing surveillance as well as understanding consumer appeal, perceptions and consumption are critical next steps in tracking potential uptake of these new products.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsTobacco, SmokelessAdvertisingHealth ExpendituresHumansNicotineRetrospective StudiesNicotineAdvertising and PromotionMediaTobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID35803674
PMCPMC9942710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.