ArticleBMJ open2022
Health professionals' experience of implementing and delivering a 'Community Care' programme in metropolitan Melbourne: a qualitative reflexive thematic analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the Impact of an Integrated Community Care Program on Unplanned Hospital and Emergency Department Representations: Interrupted Time Series Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Observational
- The Act on Integrated Support for Community Care Including Medical and Nursing Services: Implications for the Role of Tertiary Hospitals in the Republic of Korea.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Observational
- Transition of care from hospital to home for older people with chronic diseases: a qualitative study of older patients' and health care providers' perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The Facilitators to Care Transition from Hospital to Home After Stroke: A Qualitative Study.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the experiences of health professionals involved in delivering a multidisciplinary Community Care programme that provides a transitional care coordination service for patients visiting a tertiary hospital service in Melbourne, Australia.
designReflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes from descriptions of delivering the programme, including its perceived strengths and challenges.
participants12 healthcare professionals from four disciplines working in the Community Care programme were interviewed.
resultsFour themes were identified: (1) 'increasingly complex', depicts the experience of delivering care to patients with increasingly complex health needs; (2) 'plugging unexpected gaps', describes meeting patient's healthcare needs; (3) 'disconnected', explains system-based issues which made participants feel disconnected from the wider health service; (4) 'a misunderstood programme', illustrates that a poor understanding of the programme within the health service is a barrier to patient enrolment which may have been exacerbated by a service name change.
conclusionsThe healthcare professionals involved in this study described the experience of providing care to patients as challenging, but felt they made a positive difference. By unravelling the patients' health problems in context of their surroundings, they were able to recognise the increasingly complex patients' health needs. The disconnection they faced to integrate within the wider healthcare system made their role at times difficult. This disconnection was partly contributed to by the fact that they felt the programme was misunderstood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.