Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35803620›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Current practice of postoperative fasting: results from a multicentre survey in China.

Lifei Lai, Lianghua Zeng, Zhijing Yang, Yingling Zheng, Qianqian Zhu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05823649 (Effect of Early Versus Delayed Postoperative Feeding in Lower Limb Fracture Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05823649 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Early Versus Delayed Postoperative Feeding in Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArmed Police Force Hospital, NepalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled275ConditionsLower Limb FractureArmsEarly feeding/intervention group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lifei LaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Lianghua ZengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Qianhai Shekou Free Trade Zone Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Zhijing YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yingling ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China zhuxx25@mail.sysu.edu.cn 1039902956@qq.com.
Qianqian ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China zhuxx25@mail.sysu.edu.cn 1039902956@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6897-136X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA gap between clinical practice and evidence is common. The present multicentre study was designed to explore the actual postoperative fasting practice, including the instructed fasting time from the ward staff and the actual postoperative fasting time.

designMulticentre survey.

settingFour tertiary hospitals in Shenzhen City, China.

participantsA total of 988 patients completed a survey on instructed and actual postoperative fasting. OUTCOMES: All patients received postoperative instructed fasting time from the ward staff. The median instructed fasting time for fluids from ward staff was 6 hours (IQR, 4-6 hours), and the median instructed fasting time for solid food was also 6 hours (IQR 5-6 hours) after surgery. The actual postoperative fasting time, including fluid and solid food intake, was significantly longer than the time recommended by the ward staff (both p<0.001).

resultsThe median time to postoperative first flatus (FFL) was 16.5 hours (IQR 8-25.5 hours), and the median time to postoperative first faeces (FFE) was 41 hours (IQR 25-57 hours). The fasting time was significantly shorter than the time to FFL and the time to FFE, regardless of surgery type or anaesthesia type (all p<0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurred in 23.6% of patients. After surgery, 58.70% of patients reported thirst, and 47.47% reported hunger. No ileus occurred.

conclusionApproximately half of the patients reported thirst and hunger postoperatively. Patients initiated oral intake earlier than the time to FFL or FFE without increasing serious complications. This study may support the rationale for interventions targeting postoperative oral intake time in future studies.

Indexed as

FastingThirstHumansHungerPostoperative PeriodTime Factorsadult anaesthesiaadult surgerynutritional support

Identifiers

PMID35803620
PMCPMC9272104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.