ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022
Development of Certified Reference Material for Amino Acids in Dried Blood Spots and Accuracy Assessment of Disc Sampling.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dried Blood Spot Analysis for Simultaneous Quantification of Antiepileptic Drugs Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2025Article
- Amino Acid Hepatotoxicity Biomarkers in Human Hepatic Organoids: Promising Standardization of Drug Toxicity Evaluation.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of a candidate reference measurement procedure for detecting 17α-hydroxyprogesterone in dried blood spots using isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Harmonization of distributed multi-center analysis based on dried blood spot reference materials supporting the screening of neonatal inherited metabolic disorders.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To achieve the measurement reliability of amino acids used as diagnostic markers in clinical fields, establishing a reference measurement system is required, in which certified reference materials (CRMs) are an essential step in the hierarchy of measurement traceability. This study describes the development of dried blood spot (DBS) CRMs for amino acid analysis with complete measurement traceability to the International System of Units (SI). Six essential amino acids─proline, valine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine─were analyzed using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (ID-MS). For minimizing measurement bias and uncertainty overestimation, whole spots with 50 μL of whole blood were adopted in the certification. The between-spot homogeneities by whole spot sampling were lower than 2.1%. The relative expanded uncertainties of the six amino acids in the developed DBS CRMs were lower than 5.7% at 95% confidence. The certified values are traceable to SI through both gravimetric preparation and the primary method in certification, ID-MS. Comparison among DBS testing laboratories revealed discrepancies between the whole spot and disc sampling methods. The actual sampling volume was accurately estimated by weighing, which revealed the possibility of underestimation in routine DBS testing. The candidate CRMs can support the standardization of DBS testing for amino acids through the qualification and validation of many kinds of measurement procedures to compensate the measurement bias caused by matrix-specific sampling error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.