Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35802782›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of hematology2022

Innovative strategies to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcomes in myelofibrosis.

Jacinta Perram, David M Ross, Donal McLornan, Krisstina Gowin, Nicolas Kröger, Vikas Gupta, Clinton Lewis, Nico Gagelmann, Nada Hamad

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Jacinta PerramDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0054-7906
David M RossDepartment of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Donal McLornanDepartment of Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University College London Hospitals NHS, London, UK.
Krisstina GowinDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Nicolas KrögerDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Vikas GuptaMedical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clinton LewisDepartment of Haematology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9329-249X
Nico GagelmannDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nada HamadDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7929-1450
Universität Hamburg · DEUNSW Sydney · AUAuckland City Hospital · NZPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASouth Australia Pathology · AUUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by inflammation, marrow fibrosis, and an inherent risk of blastic transformation. Hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative therapy for this disease, however, survival gains observed for other transplant indications over the past two decades have not been realized for MF. The role of transplantation may also evolve with the use of novel targeted agents. The chronic inflammatory state associated with MF necessitates pretransplantation assessment of end-organ function. Applying the transplant methodology employed for other myeloid disorders to patients with MF fails to acknowledge differences in the underlying disease pathophysiology. Limited understanding of the causes of poor transplant outcomes in this cohort has prevented refinement of transplant eligibility criteria in MF. There is increasing evidence of heterogeneity in molecular disease grade, beyond the clinical manifestations which have traditionally guided transplant timing. Exploring the physiological consequences of disease chronicity unique to MF, acknowledging the heterogeneity in disease grade, and using advanced prognostic models, molecular diagnostics and other organ function diagnostic tools, we present an innovative review of strategies with the potential to improve transplant outcomes in this disease. Larger, prospective studies which consider the impact of molecular-based disease grade are needed for MF transplantation.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMyeloproliferative DisordersPrimary MyelofibrosisHumansProspective StudiesTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID35802782
PMCPMC9796730
OpenAlexW4284895899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.