ArticlePloS one2022
How representative are student convenience samples? A study of literacy and numeracy skills in 32 countries.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender and sex differences in adherence to a Mediterranean diet and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Digital Behavior Change Interventions for Digital Overuse: Scoping Review of Current Approaches and Emerging AI-Enabled Systems.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A cross-modal framework for evaluating the mental health benefits of urban and natural landscapes in sustainable cities: an empirical study based on undergraduate students.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of Solution-Focused Measures.Journal of marital and family therapy · 2026Article
- The Community Readiness Instrument: A Quantitative Measurement Using Statistical Best Practices to Assess Systemic Change Readiness.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of behaviors, attitudes, and awareness regarding skin cancer among polish medical and non-medical students: comparative analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Key factors and serial mediation analysis of anxiety and depression among university students: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Strategic reminder setting for time-based intentions: Influence of metacognition, delay length, and cue visibility.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- Enhancing representativeness in population-based surveys to improve data quality and decision-making.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The need for research on orthorexia nervosa: looking back, looking forward.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2025Article
- Psychosocial work environment beyond WEIRD: meta-analytic and psychometric evidence on the Job Content Questionnaire.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Age-related differences in trust beliefs during middle childhood: Downward-extension and validation of the general trust scale.PloS one · 2025Article
- Exploring trust dynamics in health information systems: the impact of patients' health conditions on information source preferences.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Identifying Barriers to Basic Needs, Academic Success, and the Vaccination Pattern among College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Emerging Adults' Perception of the Typical Dementia Patient Based on Gender and Race.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological research, including research into adult reading, is frequently based on convenience samples of undergraduate students. This practice raises concerns about the external validity of many accepted findings. The present study seeks to determine how strong this student sampling bias is in literacy and numeracy research. We use the nationally representative cross-national data from the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies to quantify skill differences between (i) students and the general population aged 16-65, and (ii) students and age-matched non-students aged 16-25. The median effect size for the comparison (i) of literacy scores across 32 countries was d = .56, and for comparison (ii) d = .55, which exceeds the average effect size in psychological experiments (d = .40). Numeracy comparisons (i) and (ii) showed similarly strong differences. The observed differences indicate that undergraduate students are not representative of the general population nor age-matched non-students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.