Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35802687›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Association between tocilizumab, sarilumab and all-cause mortality at 28 days in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: A network meta-analysis.

Peter J Godolphin, David J Fisher, Lindsay R Berry, Lennie P G Derde, Janet V Diaz, Anthony C Gordon, Elizabeth Lorenzi, John C Marshall, Srinivas Murthy, Manu Shankar-Hari and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Sarilumab plus standard of careEClinicalMedicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Perspective: repurposed drugs for COVID-19.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Peter J GodolphinMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0648-0992
David J FisherMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, United Kingdom.
Lindsay R BerryBerry Consultants, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Lennie P G DerdeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Janet V DiazClinical Unit, Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anthony C GordonDivision of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth LorenziBerry Consultants, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
John C MarshallLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Srinivas MurthyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Manu Shankar-HariCentre for Inflammation Research, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jonathan A C SternePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jayne F TierneyMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, United Kingdom.
Claire L ValeMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, United Kingdom.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBBerry & Associates (United States) · USImperial College London · GBNHS Lothian · GBSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CAWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

Department of Health NIHR301653Department of Health NIHR-CS-2016-16-011Department of Health RP-2015-06-018Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/06World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent prospective meta-analysis demonstrated that interleukin-6 antagonists are associated with lower all-cause mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, compared with usual care or placebo. However, emerging evidence suggests that clinicians are favouring the use of tocilizumab over sarilumab. A new randomised comparison of these agents from the REMAP-CAP trial shows similar effects on in-hospital mortality. Therefore, we initiated a network meta-analysis, to estimate pairwise associations between tocilizumab, sarilumab and usual care or placebo with 28-day mortality, in COVID-19 patients receiving concomitant corticosteroids and ventilation, based on all available direct and indirect evidence.

methodsEligible trials randomised hospitalised patients with COVID-19 that compared tocilizumab or sarilumab with usual care or placebo in the prospective meta-analysis or that directly compared tocilizumab with sarilumab. Data were restricted to patients receiving corticosteroids and either non-invasive or invasive ventilation at randomisation. Pairwise associations between tocilizumab, sarilumab and usual care or placebo for all-cause mortality 28 days after randomisation were estimated using a frequentist contrast-based network meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs), implementing multivariate fixed-effects models that assume consistency between the direct and indirect evidence.

findingsOne trial (REMAP-CAP) was identified that directly compared tocilizumab with sarilumab and supplied results on all-cause mortality at 28-days. This network meta-analysis was based on 898 eligible patients (278 deaths) from REMAP-CAP and 3710 eligible patients from 18 trials (1278 deaths) from the prospective meta-analysis. Summary ORs were similar for tocilizumab [0·82 [0·71-0·95, p = 0·008]] and sarilumab [0·80 [0·61-1·04, p = 0·09]] compared with usual care or placebo. The summary OR for 28-day mortality comparing tocilizumab with sarilumab was 1·03 [95%CI 0·81-1·32, p = 0·80]. The p-value for the global test of inconsistency was 0·28.

conclusionsAdministration of either tocilizumab or sarilumab was associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality compared with usual care or placebo. The association is not dependent on the choice of interleukin-6 receptor antagonist.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedsarilumabtocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID35802687
PMCPMC9269978
OpenAlexW4284970605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.