Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35802565›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Community succession and straw degradation characteristics using a microbial decomposer at low temperature.

Xin Zhang, Qinggeer Borjigin, Julin Gao, Xiaofang Yu, Bizhou Zhang, Shuping Hu, Shengcai Han, Ruizhi Liu, Sainan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The composting microbiome and a multifunctionalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Synergistic Co-Inoculation ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xin ZhangAgricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Qinggeer BorjiginAgricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Julin GaoAgricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-8062
Xiaofang YuAgricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Bizhou ZhangSpecial Crop Research Institute of the Academy of Agricultural and Livestock Sciences of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Shuping HuKey Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Genetic Improvement in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Shengcai HanKey Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Genetic Improvement in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Ruizhi LiuAgricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Sainan ZhangAgricultural College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored changes in the microbial community structure during straw degradation by a microbial decomposer, M44. The microbial community succession at different degradation periods was analyzed using MiSeq high-throughput sequencing. The results showed that 14 days after inoculation, the filter paper enzyme and endoglucanase activities increased to 2.55 U·mL-1 and 2.34 U·mL-1. The xylanase, laccase, and lignin peroxidase activities rose to 9.86 U·mL-1, 132.16 U·L-1, and 85.43 U·L-1 after 28 d, which was consistent with changes in the straw degradation rate. The degradation rates of straw, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose were 31.43%, 13.67%, 25.04%, and 21.69%, respectively, after 28 d of fermentation at 15°C. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes were the main bacterial species in samples at different degradation stages. The dominant genera included Pseudomonas, Delftia, and Paenibacillus during the initial stage (1 d, 7 d) and the mid-term stage (14 d). The key functional microbes during the late stage (21 d, 28 d) were Rhizobium, Chryseobacterium, Sphingobacterium, Brevundimonas, and Devosia. Changes in the bacterial consortium structure and straw degradation characteristics during different degradation periods were clarified to provide a theoretical basis for the rational utilization of microbial decomposer M44.

Indexed as

CelluloseLigninBacteriaFermentationMicrobial ConsortiaTemperatureCelluloseLignin

Identifiers

PMID35802565
PMCPMC9269364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.