ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2022
Valuing the Diversity of Research Methods to Advance Nutrition Science.
Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review on the effects of exercise on gut microbial diversity, taxonomic composition, and microbial metabolites: identifying research gaps and future directions.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Pooled it
- Intersection of Precision Nutrition and Bladder Cancer: A Narrative State-of-the-Art Review of Potential Applications and Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association of the dietary-behavioral risk index with metabolic syndrome and its components: a cross-sectional study in rural China.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- The relative validity of the updated Menzies Remote Short-Item Dietary Assessment Tool (MRSDAT) for use with remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and adults.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Precision nutrition for cardiometabolic diseases.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- The Use of Pictorial Recall Aids Modifies Dietary Assessment Results: Experiences from Quantitative 24-hour Dietary Recalls of Young Children in Nepal and Senegal.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
- Priority setting for nutrition research in individuals with spinal cord injury: A protocol for Delphi study among health professionals.PloS one · 2025Article
- Reclaiming voices, rethinking change: a decolonial and knowledge-ecological analysis of SBCC nutrition interventions in Senegal.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Interactions between Dietary Antioxidants, Dietary Fiber and the Gut Microbiome: Their Putative Role in Inflammation and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Using Novel Multimethod Evaluation Approaches to Understand Complex Food System Interventions: Insights from a Supply Chain Intervention Intended to Improve Nutrition.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Creating culturally-informed protocols for a stunting intervention using a situated values-based approach (WeValue InSitu): a double case study in Indonesia and Senegal.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Longitudinal changes in home food availability and concurrent associations with food and nutrient intake among children at 24-48 months.Public health nutrition · 2024Article
- A Decade of Dietary Assessment Methodology Research at the National Institutes of Health, 2012-2021.The Journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Perspective: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Data Quality in Nutrient Databases.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Review
- Novel Lines of Research on the Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Nut Consumption.Nutrients · 2023Review
- ASN Highlights the Need for Multiple Methods Within Nutrition Research to Advance the Field.Current developments in nutrition · 2022Article
- Breaking new frontiers: Assessment and re-evaluation of clinical trial design for nutraceuticals.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ASN Board of Directors appointed the Nutrition Research Task Force to develop a report on scientific methods used in nutrition science to advance discovery, interpretation, and application of knowledge in the field. The genesis of this report was growing concern about the tone of discourse among nutrition professionals and the implications of acrimony on the productive study and translation of nutrition science. Too often, honest differences of opinion are cast as conflicts instead of areas of needed collaboration. Recognition of the value (and limitations) of contributions from well-executed nutrition science derived from the various approaches used in the discipline, as well as appreciation of how their layering will yield the strongest evidence base, will provide a basis for greater productivity and impact. Greater collaborative efforts within the field of nutrition science will require an understanding that each method or approach has a place and function that should be valued and used together to create the nutrition evidence base. Precision nutrition was identified as an important emerging nutrition topic by the preponderance of task force members, and this theme was adopted for the report because it lent itself to integration of many approaches in nutrition science. Although the primary audience for this report is nutrition researchers and other nutrition professionals, a secondary aim is to develop a document useful for the various audiences that translate nutrition research, including journalists, clinicians, and policymakers. The intent is to promote accurate, transparent, verifiable evidence-based communication about nutrition science. This will facilitate reasoned interpretation and application of emerging findings and, thereby, improve understanding and trust in nutrition science and appropriate characterization, development, and adoption of recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.